问了一下GPT, Tesla 认为FSD已经超过了99%的人类司机，但是如我估计，统计上很难讲谁是top1%的司机。

According to Tesla's data, their Full Self Driving (FSD) technology is statistically safer than the average human driver, and even surpasses the driving ability of a top 1% human driver in terms of accident rates, with significantly fewer crashes per million miles driven; however, independent testing and safety concerns remain regarding FSD's capabilities in complex driving scenarios, especially when compared to a truly exceptional human driver in edge cases. 

 

 

Key points about FSD vs top 1% human driver: 

 

 

• Full Self Driving (FSD) Beta crashes significantly less frequently than the average driver, with a crash rate of 0.31 times per million miles on non-highway roads, compared to the national average of 1.53 crashes per million miles for human drivers, suggesting that even a top 1% human driver would likely still have a higher crash rate than FSD in most driving scenarios; however, it's important to note that this data is self-reported by Tesla and may not be fully verified by independent researchers.
• Sensor capabilities:

  FSD utilizes advanced sensors and computer vision to process information much faster than a human, potentially allowing for quicker reactions to changing road conditions. 

   

   
• Consistency:

  While a top human driver may consistently perform well, FSD aims to maintain a high level of driving performance across all situations, eliminating distractions like fatigue or inattention. 

   

   
• Limitations of FSD:

  Critics argue that while FSD may excel in routine driving, it can struggle with unpredictable situations, edge cases, and challenging weather conditions where a skilled human driver might adapt better. 

   

   
• Testing and regulation:

  Independent testing and regulatory oversight are crucial to fully assess the safety and capabilities of FSD compared to top human drivers.