Without ensuing materials, based on my first impression after watching the famous Zhang-Liu video, I concluded Liu had more problem than Zhang--in that particular interview.
My original intention was to show such an angle: Zhang was not as evil as what people like to believe, and Liu was not as proper as what people advocate. We never live in a black and white world. So far the goal has been achieved. Who is worse is arguable, and is up to the individual observer.
While I continue to support Zhang and his program OVERALL (for his frankness, not for his rudeness or controversial viewpoints), he does, however, need some future interviewees to teach him equality. To begin with, the stupid title "teacher" should be gone in all such programs--inequality starts from there. And those hirers' big vintage chairs are just as funny and unfair to the interviewee; interviewers and interviewee should all stand or sit.
