"f/1.4 is much "faster" than f/5.6" It is 16X to be exact

来源: zzyzx 2006-12-16 18:18:51 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (19 bytes)




所有跟帖: 

huh? 16X? It's better to use the f-stops--no confusion there. -moab- 给 moab 发送悄悄话 moab 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/16/2006 postreply 18:57:52

"It's better to use the f-stops--no confusion there." Then ,don -zzyzx- 给 zzyzx 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/16/2006 postreply 19:41:49

'nt bother, computer calculates for you:) -zzyzx- 给 zzyzx 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/16/2006 postreply 19:59:54

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”