没想到你也没有分清“群体”和“全部”的区别。遗憾。

在文中我特别加了一段些这个区别。

关于儿童虐待，美国的调查数据的标准就和中国不一样。如果按美国的要求，中国的比例就不知道会有多惊人了。要知道孝道和儿童虐待之间的（非直接）关系，如有兴趣，可以看我的“孝道与儿童虐待”一文。

如果你认为我那篇上书国际儿童保护组织的英文信是仅仅用了6六个例子就得出结论，你可能根本没有读那篇文章。我现在把其中的一段拷贝在此：

“The real horror behind these astonishing crimes is not only how brutal they were, but also the fact that they were not committed underground. All these sample cases were more or less known to neighborhoods, condemned by some people even in the media, yet they were still not stopped. The first case (Li Su, 1993) was reported in newspapers several times, but Li Su was nonetheless left alone until she paid the ultimate price. All these examples reveal a fact, that child abuse, especially family child abuse in China is not well recognized by society and not effectively supervised and punished by the law. Children in China who suffer from family abuse are not properly protected, and we could even say, based on the cases above, those children were not protected at all. ”

我想，任何一个在美国生活过多年的人，都会知道，这样的例子（一个12岁的女孩子被父母用烧红的火钳烙遍全身，出逃后到了公安局又被送回父母手中），根本不可发生在美国 ！
  

说我写文章是艺术家的想向，缺乏思辨，那大概是你的有色眼睛，因为你已经知道我是艺术家。在我的身份没有暴露之前，没有任何一个人拿“艺术”说事（并且如果我偶尔谈艺术还立即有人站出来说这不是我的本行，劝我回去继续搞“文化研究”。哈哈。）。至于思辨，我自己非常清楚自己的能力在那个水准上。