回复：一般来说运运都是如此的简单思维。

>>>这个障碍是战略层面的

Strategic obstacles? What obstacles? The “first island chains”? PRC already has control of Hong Kong and Hainan Island, remember? The PLAN has traveled to Latin America and Europe also without much impediment. What strategic obstacles could there be? Please do tell. I am curious.

And, frankly, if you ask me, I’d say that the one-party rule posed greater obstacles onto China – they are making Chinese people dumber and dumber. Some would even believe the things written in the article above.


>>>其次，本人敢说中国需要一个以上的党派来实行民主，但是不是现在。

If so, then what’s the hurry for unification? Why can’t we wait until the day when such democracy (of which you are in favor of) flourishes in mainland, and then discuss unification? Why can’t the author at least respect those who wanted to maintain status quo until the day that mainland becomes a better place?


>>>现在的运运还是歇了罢。

No man. I think the FQs should take a break, and stop occupying this forum, and scare away the rational Taiwanese people who wanted rational discussions. FQs have done much, much more for Taiwan Independence than DPP or Chen Shui-bian ever could. As a person who doesn’t want to see TI happen, I feel obligated to educate the brainless FQs at least one thing: if you don’t have something good to say, maybe you should just stay quiet.

所有跟帖： 

• 我懒得跟您这种水平的多说。您这样的我见多了，不值得一提。 -笔名花差花差农民- ♂ (64 bytes) () 02/28/2007 postreply 14:43:20

• 回复：我懒得跟您这种水平的多说。您这样的我见多了，不值得一提。 -HCC- ♂ (750 bytes) () 02/28/2007 postreply 15:34:25

• 随便，您这样的我见多了。 -笔名花差花差农民- ♂ (158 bytes) () 02/28/2007 postreply 20:40:59

• 回复：随便，您这样的我见多了。 -HCC- ♂ (944 bytes) () 03/01/2007 postreply 12:38:26