Jeremy Lin 的优点和缺点

来源: 2012-02-20 23:25:11 [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读:
先声明,我从LIN在哈佛大四开始关注他,窃以为他的选秀位置应该是第二轮中间。当初他played in Maverick’s Summer League. 如果Maverick签了他,是他当初最好的机会,因为Lin在NBA的位置只能是组织后卫。在Jason Kidd手下,他能学到的最多,包括防守(Kidd的防守在组织后卫中是绝对一流)。Carlisle也会给他一定机会,尤其是在Beaubois受伤的情况下。签约Warriors是根本没前途。Warriors是瞎打一气,前两年的教练也不会采用Lin最擅长的pick and roll.







优点:



1. -->他有能力整合队友到一个流畅的进攻体系中。这种能力可以提高,但更确切地说是种天分。或者有,或者没有。没有的人在努力也只能是很一般的水平。



2. -->篮球IQ高。视野开阔。知道队友最舒服的投篮位置和方式。



3. -->对pick and roll的理解非常好。在操作中能时刻保持运球状态。



4. -->在组织后卫中,属于上篮能力比较强的,尤其是方式较多。



5. -->心理超佳。关键时候表现更好。



6. -->中远投不错。动作有缺陷,但在压力下能保持不变形。



7. -->身高,体重,速度,在组织后卫中位于中等,除了个别体质极强的组织后卫(Rose, Westbrook),一对一没有明显劣势。







缺点:



1. -->护球。在侧身护球时,球离身体过近。在大学可以。面对身高臂长的NBA球员时易被偷。



2. -->传球。有些传球在大学可以,在NBA会被截,因为球员更高更快更长。这个需要有段时间适应,容易提高。 (Rubio is experiencing the same now.)



3. -->护球. 进攻上蓝时,手臂护球不够,并且有时球离身过远,容易被强行断下。 (多看Manu的上蓝录像学习。)



4. -->有时过于强行上篮,尤其时篮下人满为患时。一是易被强行断下。二是投出去的球命中率不高。(Be smart. Lin has the basketball IQ to improve this.)



5. -->防守。一对一防守不错。换位防守和整体防守时易漏人,有时象无头苍蝇.(Knicks 不是非常注重防守。要是在Spurs,Mavericks,Bulls,Lin会被教练骂死,或直接换下场。)



6. -->罚篮。作为后卫需要提高。







前景:



如果继续提高,能达到Tony Parker的总体能力是我个人能估计的最好前景。达到Kidd,Paul,Nash,Rose的总体能力是美好愿望而已。







具体和现役组织后卫比较:







优点前三项:



- 现役组织后卫中,Chris Paul, Kidd, Nash, and Rubio are the best.



Paul is the best point guard considering all the factors.



Kidd and Nash are legendary. They are old now, though. They might retire in one or two years.



Rubio is an essentially a rookie, like Lin, and is still adjusting NBA games.



Jin is currently a little below Deron Williams and Rose. He is in the same category with Tony Parker, Rondo. I think he is a little better than John Wall. Westbrook is a great guard, but he is not very good in these three abilities. Westbrook is more of a combo guard.







上篮能力:



Rose and Westbrook are the best. They are freakishly athletic.



Tony Parker is fast and very crafty to attack the basket. His tear-drop is the best among all the guards.



Deron Williams is the most versatile in offense. He does everything in a high level, although unfortunately, he is not the best in any single category.



Paul can go anywhere if he wants, including the basket. He doesn’t incline to attack the basket much, though.







随便说一下:



Jason Kidd is the best point guard after Magic Johnson and Stockton. He is also the best in rebounding and defense among point guards. He is always at the right position, both in offense and in defense. His shortcoming is his streaky shooting.



Nash is the best point guard in executing run-and-gun. If you are open in your most comfort position, Nash would get the ball to your hands. He keeps dribbling, pick and roll, and penetrating to tear holes in the defense. He is one of the best shooters in the history. Nash’s shortcoming is his defense.



Paul is as good as any point guard in the history in running offense. He is already the best point guard after Kidd. He is an excellent 2-point shooter as well. Paul’s 3-pointer is ok.



Deron Williams, as said above, is the most versatile in offense. He does everything in a high level, although unfortunately, he is not the best in any single category. Deron is very strong physically.



Rose is a unique point guard. He can run offense very well and get teammates involved. He would be in top 5 if we only talk about pure point guard skills. His attacking ability is so exceptional that it is a pity that he doesn’t show it to the audience. Bulls need his scoring badly. So in Bulls games, Rose keeps switching between the two roles. Rose and Paul have the most influence to their respective team.



- - -->Westbrook is capable of attacking and scoring as Rose. He is even better in rebounding. But his ability to run team offense is so-so. It is an agony to watch that he went hot-headed, had very bad shot selections, while ignoring Kevin Duant, his teammate and the best scorer in the league.



Rondo is a very good point guard. He runs offense well. His defense is exceptional. He can’t shoot, though. He shoots balls like bricks at NBA’s standard.



- - -->Tony Parker, as a pure point guard, is good, but not impressive. He excels in executing Pop’s system very well. He is very fast and knows how to get to the basket. His tear-drops is a beauty. I believe he is No.1 among point guards in term of scoring in the paint.



- - -->Jose Calderon. A pure point guard. His strength is that he doesn’t turn over. On the other hand, he is not much a scorer. He is not aggressive and doesn’t look very devoted. Otherwise, he could be much better than he is.



John Wall. He is in a very bad team, under bad coaches. It seems that hurts him a lot, since he looks lost, not as good as he looked when he was drafted.



Andrew Miller. A traditional point guard. He has exceptional point guard skills. He is the only point guard after Mark Jackson (the current Warriors coach) who likes and is able to attack with his back to the basket. His shooting is acceptable for a point guard. He has the abilities to one of the top point guards. It looks he is not very devoted. He doesn’t look like he cares.



Ty Lawson. He might be the fastest player in the league. He is short. Otherwise he would be a very good combo guard. He can run an offense. He is better at attacking than running a team, though.



Stephen Curry. If he were taller and stronger, he would have been a top 5 shooting guard in the league. An exceptional shooter. He transforms into a point guard very well, though. He is a very good point good. Unfortunately, he was drafted by a team with the worst offense system and he has to play with Monta Ellis. Hopefully, Mark Jackson will change the team. Curry, David Lee, and their starting center could play pick-and-roll very well.



Raymond Felton. Another North Carolina guard who is better at attacking by himself than running an offense. I like Ty Lawson better than Felton, since Ty Lawson is more controlled.