Let's DO talk about the issues

First, Clinton's campaign was not nearly as incompetent as Coakley's; although Clinton was somewhat complacent at the beginning of the primaries, she did not spend a complete month out of sight because of overconfidence. In the late primaries, Clinton's campaign gradually became better organized, although it was too late to overcome Obama's delegate lead.

Second, Obama's policies will not bankrupt the country. I'll tell you what will bankrupt the country. The dominance of insurance companies over the lives of so many people, forcing them into emergency rooms at the expense of the general populace, will bankrupt the country. The nation's increasing dependence on foreign sources of fuel, such as oil, will bankrupt the country. Global warming, which will wreak havoc on the United States's agricultural and transportation infrastructure, will bankrupt the country. Unregulated banks taking money without accountability or consequences will bankrupt the country. A regressive tax policy that places more of the tax burden on the middle and working class than on the upper class will bankrupt the country. Your comment exemplifies the portrayal of the Republicans as the "party of no". The Republicans's singleminded goal is to block every piece of legislation sponsored by the Democratic majority. They don't care about discussing the issues at all. For all their talk of military hegemony, they were willing to block funding for the military in order to stall the Senate vote on health care. For all their talk of national security and patriotism, they were willing to use the December 25th attempted bombing as a scare tactic to fundraise.

所有跟帖： 

• 这个么见人见智啦 -howcan^- ♀ (265 bytes) () 01/19/2010 postreply 20:38:45

• 偶也是借贵方宝地说一声 -AnaZhang- ♀ (60 bytes) () 01/19/2010 postreply 20:42:25

• 回复：偶也是借贵方宝地说一声 -柳上惠- ♂ (93 bytes) () 01/19/2010 postreply 20:54:13

• 回复：咏梅诗太多了。你说的是这首？ (图) -柳上惠- ♂ (88 bytes) () 01/19/2010 postreply 22:17:15

• 回复：还是你厉害 -柳上惠- ♂ (24 bytes) () 01/19/2010 postreply 22:25:00