回复：其实很想和高手中的高高手较量，但这种人太少了

Funny, you made several offensive comments, yet, you asked your ideal 高手 to be 很低调，淡薄名利，宠辱不惊.

I can think of a 高手中的高高手, who 很低调，淡薄名利，宠辱不惊 -- Grigori Perelman, who has proved the famous Poincare conjecture and who refused the prestigious Field's medal. The problem for you to 较量 such 高手中的高高手 is that, they will not be interested in the questions that interest you, and you will need to learn a lot in order even to understand what they are interested in.

Trust me, some of the 高手 here are good enough for the discussions of most of the intelligent questions you are interested in (for example, the 3-fool question you posted, which is a good one). Once you realize how good they are, you will begin to really understand how good those 高高手 are, and then you will rethink about your ambition to "和高手中的高高手较量" -- which is almost a joke given your current way of thinking ( e.g., emphasis yi(4)jing(4) but not correctness ).

I admit I may be snobbish here, so don't get upset by these comments.