Turns out I'm not the first one who used the analogy. Someone did a much better job back in January. Of course he got paid to do it.
http://www.slate.com/id/2181357
First, the Democrats:
Barack Obama is the alternative-energy sector. Hybrid, next-generation upstart, unafraid of entrenched market leaders, and embraced by corn-growing Iowans, Silicon Valley venture capitalists, and East Coast moneymen. While mocked by establishment for naivete, unviable business plans, and the audacity to challenge traditional market leaders, manages to rise above toxic emissions. National market share still lags behind legacy systems, yet attracts hot money, media attention galore, and younger consumers. Recommendation: Strong buy.
Hillary Clinton is Citigroup. New York-based, enormously well-capitalized, longstanding market leader whose name is synonymous with the sector it dominates. A powerhouse in the 1990s is having difficulty reclaiming past glory. Miscalculations about competitors and poor assessment of risks in the marketplace led the establishment player to suffer unexpected market losses. As it steels itself for more write-downs in the wake of subprime performance, continues to bank on 1990s Clinton administration icon for credibility (Rubin for Citigroup, Bill Clinton for Hillary Clinton). Recommendation: Hold.
John Edwards is McDonald's. Disdained by the media elite as déclassé, shunned by the fashionable as too populist and unhealthy to body politic, manages to thrive by working hard and dishing out cheap meat and potatoes to working-class patrons. Worldly sophistication is belied by simple message that appeals to economically disadvantaged consumers. Two Americas? Two all-beef patties? Recommendation: Hold.
The Republicans:
Mike Huckabee is Chick-fil-A. Cheaper, healthier Southern alternative to steak and prime rib dished up by urban rivals. Explicitly fuses religion into business strategy in a way that no competitor does. (Chick-fil-A isn't open on Sundays.) Thrives in rural and Southern areas. Disdains Wall Street and has yet to stage a full-fledged national initial public offering. Recommendation: Buy.
Mitt Romney is the Blackstone Group. Insecure private-equity player that tries to wow the masses with ostentatious displays of wealth—kitted out Mitt-Mobile for Romney, $3 million birthday party for Blackstone head honcho Steve Schwartzman. Achilles' heel: Ambition leads to hypocrisy and intellectual inconsistency. Blackstone goes public after trashing public markets, Romney trashes Massachusetts after proclaiming love for state. Unimpressed with money, resources, and fancy toys, salt-of-the-earth investors see through the B.S. While stock is at 52-week low, can't be written off due to deep reservoirs of cash, ruthlessness, and cynicism. Recommendation: Hold.
Rudy Giuliani is Bear Stearns. New York-based firm spent years since 2001 raising easy money and globe-trotting. Initials of both should be B.S. Questions raised about judgment and adolescent personal behavior of standard-bearer—alleged dope-smoking for Bear Stearns CEO James Cayne, sex on the city for Giuliani. Public recoils after allegations raise fundamental questions about character. Apparently flawed investment strategy—blowing off Iowa and New Hampshire for Rudy, subprime all the time for Bear Stearns—leads to significant write-downs of asset values. Recommendation: Sell.
John McCain is General Motors. Old warhorse with solid reputation as patriotic brand takes repeated kicks but refuses to give in. Buoyed by poor performance of two top domestic rivals and by positive developments overseas—Iraq for McCain, growth abroad for GM. Biggest challenge: dealing with legacy labor issues: illegal immigration for McCain, unions for General Motors. Recommendation: Buy.
If Presidential Candidates Were Stocks
所有跟帖:
•
Alternative energy? How about LDK? Or SLOF?
-Warsteiner-
♂
(339 bytes)
()
02/22/2008 postreply
12:54:56
•
For every successful startup, there are ten failed ones.
-alex1234-
♂
(71 bytes)
()
02/22/2008 postreply
13:08:57
•
That's why you can't afford a GLF, and you shouldn't go for one.
-Warsteiner-
♂
(346 bytes)
()
02/22/2008 postreply
13:29:10
•
Compared with other developed countries, us is still in his 20s
-alex1234-
♂
(404 bytes)
()
02/22/2008 postreply
13:50:16
•
So he's politician as usual?:p
-Warsteiner-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
02/22/2008 postreply
13:55:21
•
Yes he's politician as usual. The only difference is
-alex1234-
♂
(77 bytes)
()
02/22/2008 postreply
14:01:28
•
what about formerly Enron Corporation?
-niu9898-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
02/22/2008 postreply
13:09:26
•
That would be Bush ;)
-alex1234-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
02/22/2008 postreply
13:16:47