Interference is good. We need good interference by government

But on healthcare issue, they do not want to interfere like referee. They want to take it over and run it.

Speaking of sub prime problems( am glad that you mentioned it), I believe we need government interference with malpractice of lending industry. But I am strongly against bailout of any form. It is business. People on both ends of a deal made bad business decision and should suffer consequences. Business carries risk. If lending business got bailed out by government due to their poor judgement and bad business decision making, what about auto industry? What if they request bailout from US government? It is not unreasonable, you just bailed out lending industry, what not us? We failed for the reasons: bad business decision, right?

I am for strong defence. I feel more comfortable with that spending.

所有跟帖： 

• 回复：Interference is good. We need good interference by government -用户名被占用了- ♂ (658 bytes) () 02/17/2008 postreply 18:43:51

• Anyone? what about Hillary? She tried once. Now she try it again -baiwen- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/17/2008 postreply 18:53:58

• time is different now :-) -用户名被占用了- ♂ (173 bytes) () 02/17/2008 postreply 19:04:51

• Defense spending is different by nature. It does not have human -baiwen- ♂ (559 bytes) () 02/17/2008 postreply 19:04:40