Haha, now I understand why GOP wants to have state control.

回答: of course it is not, even worse ...用户名被占用了2012-10-15 13:42:50

所有跟帖: 

But, it's a easy fix, I suppose, have a federal exchange. -老忽叔叔- 给 老忽叔叔 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 13:48:43

NO, it is not going to work! -用户名被占用了- 给 用户名被占用了 发送悄悄话 用户名被占用了 的博客首页 (148 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 13:49:56

So, more mergers of insurance companies? That will drive down th -老忽叔叔- 给 老忽叔叔 发送悄悄话 (78 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 13:51:54

Use anti-monoply law to break it -用户名被占用了- 给 用户名被占用了 发送悄悄话 用户名被占用了 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 13:53:53

then,break it! -老忽叔叔- 给 老忽叔叔 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 13:54:21

break who? they exist only in small market -用户名被占用了- 给 用户名被占用了 发送悄悄话 用户名被占用了 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 14:02:50

small states or small market? -老忽叔叔- 给 老忽叔叔 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/15/2012 postreply 14:08:25

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!