还是要多多个心眼,确认事实真是象你男友说的那样,而不是他以此为借口沾你的便宜。要是我,一旦direct desposit帐户被冻结就立即让单位改成pay check, 怎么能继续往里面存钱而让你来出钱维持日常生活呢
对方大银行耗得起,你耗的话只给你的律师多赚钱。另外。。。
所有跟帖:
•
是的,改拿支票。但是你依旧要有银行帐号,支票兑现依然有被冻住的危险。
-用户名被占用了-
♂
(63 bytes)
()
05/14/2012 postreply
12:36:00
•
我们还没有结婚,用我银行账号deposite他monthly工资的payment,可行么?
-CristalDaisy-
♀
(35 bytes)
()
05/14/2012 postreply
12:51:52
•
见我上边的回复
-色大胆小-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
05/14/2012 postreply
12:54:44
•
换我自己,不干。但是我不是税务/财会律师,你该咨询专业建议
-用户名被占用了-
♂
(341 bytes)
()
05/14/2012 postreply
12:58:31
•
I can confirm with you: there's NO "法庭有判决garnish他的收入"
-CristalDaisy-
♀
(36 bytes)
()
05/14/2012 postreply
13:02:05
•
咱们这么说吧,你男友cosign了他表姐,你打算cosign你男友吗? 你知道答案
-用户名被占用了-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
05/14/2012 postreply
13:03:10
•
FYI...I didn't co-sign anything in any contract with my BF.
-CristalDaisy-
♀
(143 bytes)
()
05/14/2012 postreply
13:06:28
•
sounds ok, but
-用户名被占用了-
♂
(239 bytes)
()
05/14/2012 postreply
13:12:48
•
Do you think it's worth a try? I didn't see any serious risky
-CristalDaisy-
♀
(87 bytes)
()
05/14/2012 postreply
13:19:10
•
唯一的假设是你见到了法院书面判决,银行文件等等,你确信BF讲的都是事实。
-用户名被占用了-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
05/14/2012 postreply
13:21:27
•
Yes, I've seen the Judge command , and I have seen the bank stat
-CristalDaisy-
♀
(99 bytes)
()
05/14/2012 postreply
13:26:57
•
good luck with you.
-用户名被占用了-
♂
(110 bytes)
()
05/14/2012 postreply
13:42:55
•
Thanks, have a post there.
-CristalDaisy-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
05/14/2012 postreply
15:39:36
•
没有法庭判决怎么就能冻结帐户呢?另外。。。
-徒劳-
♂
(120 bytes)
()
05/14/2012 postreply
13:12:34
•
Because he is co-signer, without 法庭判决, his got his 帐户冻结,
-CristalDaisy-
♀
(122 bytes)
()
05/14/2012 postreply
13:16:53
•
without 法庭判决, how can the bank freeze his account?
-ghost_in_shell-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
05/14/2012 postreply
13:32:21
•
That's what it is, and why i come here for second opinion.
-CristalDaisy-
♀
(29 bytes)
()
05/14/2012 postreply
13:50:12
•
When you 2 have a joint account ...
-用户名被占用了-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
05/14/2012 postreply
13:43:38
•
很多地方有cash check的服务,只要身份证和几块手续费就可以兑现支票,象沃尔玛就有
-徒劳-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
05/14/2012 postreply
12:58:46