【《穹顶之下》 柴静女士的中国雾霾调查 (完整版)】 ---- 及 探讨



 

104分钟版

 
139分钟版

========================

看了一下, 看完了, 说几句

1。 发展工业 必然带来 人们 生命 生活 环境 的污染, 地构资源的破坏,
2。这是个矛盾,必须解决

3。国家 政府 的整体规划 法规的制定和执行 是个关键
4。总理 总书记, 尤其 邓 胡 赵 李 江 朱 胡 温 习 李 等人 未尽到责任,失职

5。柴静 捅出这个问题,是一件好事儿,应该得到支持肯定赞许
6。柴静 不是个学者 更不是个科学家,她的结论并非全部正确和完整,可以应该指出评判,但 不必求全责备
7。粗醅非酒乃酒母, 酒从醅出,喝酒莫忘醅

(题外话: 柴的这个片子 可能会得到 诺贝尔提名,至少;至多是嘛,你懂的~)

8。文化 知识 科学 是指导, 这个 认知和执行需要有个过程
9。利益 利润 成本 贪腐 是根基所在
10。所谓近30年来 中国在人类资源 地理环境 生活空间方面 的确是 越来越糟
为了 GDP 几乎无所不用其极
11。假冒伪劣毒 食品 饮用水 灌溉农田的水 蔬菜水果肉类蛋类,,,,,有法不依,执法不力,虚张声势

12。为了你我他她的今天 和 子孙后代的明天,我们真的需要关注和 对环境保护做点儿什么


欢迎讨论, 奉还谩骂!



=================


Atmospheric particulate matter – also known as particulate matter (PM) or particulates –
is microscopic solid or liquid matter suspended in the Earth's atmosphere.
Subtypes of atmospheric particle matter include :
suspended particulate matter (SPM), 
respirable suspended particle(RSPparticles with diameter of 10 micrometres or less, i.e. PM10), 
fine particles (diameter of 2.5 micrometres or less, i.e. PM2.5),
ultrafine particles, and soot.
 

The IARC and WHO designate airborne particulates a Group 1 carcinogen.
Particulates are the deadliest form of air pollution due to their ability to penetrate deep into the lungs
and blood streams unfiltered, causing permanent DNA mutationsheart attacks, and premature death.[4] 

In 2013, a study involving 312,944 people in nine European countries revealed that
there was no safe level of particulates and that for every increase of 10 μg/m3 in PM10,
the lung cancer rate rose 22%.
The smaller PM2.5 were particularly deadly, with a 36% increase in
lung cancer per 10 μg/m3 as it can penetrate deeper into the lungs.[5]

 

 from wiki





-----------------------------

Volume 14, No. 9, p813–822, August 2013

 
This article can be found in the following collections: Cancer epidemiology & prevention & control;Thoracic cancer
Audio/Video
 
 
 
Need help playing this video?
Supplementary video
Paolo Vineis and Helga Laszlo outline the latest results from the ESCAPE study, a Europe-wide project looking at the effects of air pollution on health, which show that prolonged exposure to air pollution increases the risk of lung cancer, even at levels below the European Union limit values.

Summary

Background

Ambient air pollution is suspected to cause lung cancer. We aimed to assess the association between long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and lung cancer incidence in European populations.

Methods

This prospective analysis of data obtained by the European Study of Cohorts for Air Pollution Effects used data from 17 cohort studies based in nine European countries. Baseline addresses were geocoded and we assessed air pollution by land-use regression models for particulate matter (PM) with diameter of less than 10 μm (PM10), less than 2·5 μm (PM2·5), and between 2·5 and 10 μm (PMcoarse), soot (PM2·5absorbance), nitrogen oxides, and two traffic indicators. We used Cox regression models with adjustment for potential confounders for cohort-specific analyses and random effects models for meta-analyses.

Findings

The 312,944 cohort members contributed 4,013,131 person-years at risk. During follow-up (mean 12·8 years), 2095 incident lung cancer cases were diagnosed.

The meta-analyses showed a statistically significant association between risk for lung cancer and PM10 (hazard ratio [HR] 1·22 [95% CI 1·03–1·45] per 10 μg/m3).

For PM2·5 the HR was 1·18 (0·96–1·46) per 5 μg/m3. The same increments of PM10 and PM2·5 were associated with HRs for adenocarcinomas of the lung of 1·51 (1·10–2·08) and 1·55 (1·05–2·29), respectively. An increase in road traffic of 4000 vehicle-km per day within 100 m of the residence was associated with an HR for lung cancer of 1·09 (0·99–1·21).

The results showed no association between lung cancer and nitrogen oxides concentration (HR 1·01 [0·95–1·07] per 20 μg/m3) or traffic intensity on the nearest street (HR 1·00 [0·97–1·04] per 5000 vehicles per day).

Interpretation

Particulate matter air pollution contributes to lung cancer incidence in Europe.

Funding

European Community's Seventh Framework Programme.







 







 

所有跟帖: 

严重同意, 该做的事很多, 柴静不管什么背景, 至少由她捅了出来, 关键在政府下一步千万别随随便便做决定 -华府采菊人- 给 华府采菊人 发送悄悄话 华府采菊人 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 11:02:20

同意! -弓尒- 给 弓尒 发送悄悄话 弓尒 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 11:04:10

中国政府已经在采取措施了,这个工作,本来就不是一天一月一年能解决的事。 -马甲2014- 给 马甲2014 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 11:48:16

1。没有预案,2。立法迟缓太晚,3。有法不依,4。执法不力,5。权钱法产业失业关系链,6。贪腐,7。上峰不知,8。民不觉,,,, -弓尒- 给 弓尒 发送悄悄话 弓尒 的博客首页 (6 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 11:57:30

赞丁院士! -wjsun- 给 wjsun 发送悄悄话 wjsun 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 14:19:36

赞丁院士!真正的科学家! -lidongmei- 给 lidongmei 发送悄悄话 lidongmei 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 15:59:12

中国的环境治理肯定不是柴的片子出来后才重视, 自己去想吧。 谁是第一次听说雾霾? -WXC8E- 给 WXC8E 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 12:02:47

对, 柴前 早已有, 只是 执行不力, -弓尒- 给 弓尒 发送悄悄话 弓尒 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 12:06:26

对啊,我也不明白这个纪录片怎么这么红火,感觉还是 -路过路人- 给 路过路人 发送悄悄话 (24 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 12:14:42

理性分析,不以偏概全,赞一个 -天愚- 给 天愚 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 13:28:11

如果人大代表和政协委员都象柴静一样调查,分析,研究问题,中国将向前迈进一大步 -天愚- 给 天愚 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 13:34:18

诚心 专门 探讨研究问题, 和解决方案途径步骤, 干点儿实事儿, 才是委员们 部长们,,,,该干的, -弓尒- 给 弓尒 发送悄悄话 弓尒 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 14:05:03

分析的非常好,赞! 也赞柴静为老百姓发声! -司法独立- 给 司法独立 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 16:54:57

非科学领域的柴女士能做出有关雾霾的视频,应是中国人的一件幸事。她的执着和胆量,令人敬佩。现在正是代表们开会商讨国家大事的好时机, -spruce- 给 spruce 发送悄悄话 (453 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 20:55:19

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!