To: Western Failure

说到底，你一定要有人站出来为此负责？又有谁能承担得起这种历史责任？
Yes, someone has to be responsible. CCP, no doubt about it. It should not stay in power at all. Japanese certainly love your attitude.

即使有人出来承担责任就能让中国民主了？如果你认为这样就能解决问题岂不是幼稚？

Unless you can prove Mainlanders are better off if CCP stays in power. Where is your conscience? Please don't quote me those corrupt "riches".

CCP只是个概念。你今天把旗帜拔了，牌子拆了，明天背后的利益集团还是在那里。即使你把这个集团灭了，明天还会冒出新的。不看到根本的原因，就永远摆脱不了这个轮回。

CCP is not a concept, it is a corrupt system. Let people have more "buying power", more choices. Do you know anything about power balancing? or in your mind, democracy is just one dictatorship replacing another?

真的么？骂人很过瘾，但是管用么？feel better还不是阿Q?

Mainlanders have been choronicly percecuted and repressed. Are you blind or what? Argument will bring truth and cleanse brainwashed minds.

从你的言辞就可以看出你是骂人骂惯了。你可以不同意我的观点，但你的表现说明了一点：今天你能看不管我的观点，明天你如果掌握了权力一样会压制人民的言论。

I am not interested in power. I certainly don't have the power sending you to jail because of what you have said. Let me tell you one more time, only CCP does this thing, unless you are blind or play deaf. Who else has the complete control over everything?

I don't use dirty words. If you are not comfortable, sorry, you will expect more. If you want to see a forum full of sweets and praises for CCP which certainly does not deserve those, as I said, go home, there is no arguement at home.

所有跟帖： 

• 那你给出个办法好了。你除了暴动推翻中共之外，还有什么别的建议 -看看你有什么高招- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/12/2004 postreply 16:28:18

• I am a nobody -eric_2003- ♀ (134 bytes) () 11/12/2004 postreply 19:20:49

• then u will see -samething- ♀ (40 bytes) () 11/12/2004 postreply 20:24:13

• 完全同意！顶！！！！ ----耶鲁----- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/12/2004 postreply 17:59:20

• 希望象台湾一样和平过度.得有一些英明人士来主导.大家不要总是 ----实话- ♀ (280 bytes) () 11/12/2004 postreply 22:52:30

• 这话不对,什么叫做中国人的痛苦和悲哀,你在美国不也是中国人吗 -有区别吗?- ♀ (98 bytes) () 11/13/2004 postreply 00:03:54

• 李灯灰和陈sb也是英明人物阿？把你们全卖了都不知道 -很节棍的外地民工- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/13/2004 postreply 03:06:19

• 坚持党的领导！坚持社会主义道路！坚持人民民主专政！ -共产党万岁！- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/13/2004 postreply 01:04:29