the 1st two versions are different summaries of the original document, by different authors. they are expected to be different from each other and from the original document. Yet they may not what they claimed to be. In this sense, they could be fake, but you offered no proof. The 3rd one presented the title in a table of contents. If it is not the right one, you may call it fake. But you offered no proof either. To prove it is fake, you need to present the true title of the original document from a credible source.
I agree one should be careful when quoting sources on the web because it is full of fake info. Yet it does not mean anything from a less credible source is necessarily fake. the key is to verify and have a sense of logic.
