老猫，第二段的第二句是：a claim shall exist against his estate

来源: 于 2006-07-31 07:39:03 [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读：次
并没有特定指明是individual eastate, 是否仍有可能claim it?
这是比较标准的离婚协议，想知道一般的理解是怎样的？我的理解是如果是individual eastate，当然是be a first charge against the assets。但如果不是individual eastate, "a claim shall exist against his estate"这句话又如何？