查了一下Craigslist上的discriminatory preference, 好像单写no pets 是不合法的。

来源: 于 2015-03-11 16:56:36 [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读：次

你要是加上handicap/disability人员用的狗是允许的，也许就没事了。
看来你这广告里写not pets, 那就要用到前两天引起极大争议的 except as.....这个词了。


4. handicap / disability

  • postings stating a preference for able-bodied tenants (eg. "no wheelchairs," "must be able to live independently," etc)
  • postings describing the complex as unable to accomodate people with disabilities (eg. "units are not accessible", "no pets, even seeing eye dogs", etc)
www.craigslist.org/about/FHA