回复：回复：回复：还得麻烦pjiang和8老师给我具体看看我的身份是否违例。

8老师好像以前您说我的身份算违例诶

-That is because you did not tell us your details and just said you changed your job and filed the h1 amendment which means your job responsibilites had beeen changed and of course, you would have violated the status rule due to using the old h1 to enter US. But actually from your statement here, the H1 amendment was not needed, so you are fine.

所有跟帖： 

• 回复：回复：回复：回复：还得麻烦pjiang和8老师给我具体看看我的身份是否违例。 -kanta- ♀ (19 bytes) () 09/13/2012 postreply 15:56:40

• 回复：回复：回复：回复：回复：还得麻烦pjiang和8老师给我具体看看我的身份是否违例。 -kanta- ♀ (127 bytes) () 09/13/2012 postreply 20:48:28

• 回复：回复：回复：回复：回复：回复：还得麻烦pjiang和8老师给我具体看看我的身份是否违例。 -863211- ♂ (276 bytes) () 09/13/2012 postreply 21:17:54

• 回复：还得麻烦pjiang和8老师给我具体看看我的身份是否违例。 -kanta- ♀ (107 bytes) () 09/13/2012 postreply 21:42:33

• 回复：回复：还得麻烦pjiang和8老师给我具体看看我的身份是否违例。 -863211- ♂ (276 bytes) () 09/13/2012 postreply 22:00:03