紧急请教有关NIW要求补充引用的问题，谢谢!

紧急请教有关NIW要求补充引用的问题，谢谢

我个人的情况是赶在去年8月前递了DIY的NIW的申请， 在NSC。当时因为只有两周时间，所以只能DIY，推荐信也很着急的情况下有什么就用什么了。当时我只有一篇不是第一作者的文章发表。现在收到补件通知，非常简单的要求我补充文章的引用。从文章发表到现在一年时间里我找到了11个引用（其中5个是综述，1个是Editorial）, 所有作者来自9个国家，而且全部是临床医生引用；也被文章所发杂志（IF：10）的主编在该杂志年度综述中提出来说非常有价值。我收到的补件通知原文如此：

The evidence submitted in support of the petition does not demonstrate a level of work that will serve the national interest to substantially greater degree than would a available U。S worker having the same minimum qualifications。In other words，the evidence in the record does not show that the self-petitioner has distinguished himself above other researcher in the same field。The petitioner must establish that he will serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would a available U。S researcher having the same minimum qualfications。The peririoner must demonstate that his woek has impacted or influenced the field of endeavor as a whole。

For the aforementioned reasons，in order testablish eligibility，please submit following：

Copies of published articles by other researchers citing or orher wise recognizing the petitoner’s research and/or contributions。Highlight the portion of the paper that references the petitioner’s work，in the biblography or the “works cirted”section。It is not necessary to submit articles that are self-referencing.

The evidence submitted with the petition has already been considered；therefore， please DO NOT re-submit the same evidence。

请问象我这种情况是否按信里所提就直接按要求补引用就行了？但我文章发表时间短，现在只有上面所提的11个引用。是否能让VO信服, 证明我比同行的美国人强呢？还是应该找个律师从新整理各种有用的材料，比如补充推荐信，最近又发表的PAPER和abstract，和一些其他的证据呢？总之，怎么提出让人信服, 证明我比同行的美国人强？怎么这种情况下我到底能做些什么，怎么做？谢谢！

所有跟帖： 

• 回复：紧急请教有关NIW要求补充引用的问题，谢谢! -fsa2000- ♀ (273 bytes) () 09/28/2008 postreply 19:55:38

• what is IO #? -tom2007- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 09:04:54

• I think you need a good lawyer -cowboy001- ♂ (462 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 10:18:31

• 谢谢,我刚打电话问过几个律师了,看起来挺麻烦的,都说要从新做 -繁忙的2006- ♀ (43 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 10:24:43

• 当然是重新做 -cowboy001- ♂ (142 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 15:10:45

• 谢谢,我下午和律师谈过了,要补充很多材料,原来我想太简单了 -繁忙的2006- ♀ (32 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 16:00:34

• 是这样的。 -cowboy001- ♂ (189 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 16:30:39

• 谢谢,我找过他了,但是他不接我的CASE,说我的PAPER不是 -繁忙的2006- ♀ (282 bytes) () 09/30/2008 postreply 09:43:08

• Hi Cowboy001, did you get approval for your RFE? -tom2007- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 10:32:34

• yes, I did. also I did not have very strong background -cowboy001- ♂ (360 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 14:58:50

• Cong? How long does it take after NSC received your response? Th -Tom2007- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 15:19:56

• about 12-13 days -cowboy001- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 15:31:50

• Thanks -Tom2007- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 15:21:11

• I got the exact same RFE as yours. My IO is 0175 -Tom2007- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 15:57:14

• 你找律师了吗?我把信放在单位了,等我看看告诉你IO的号码 -繁忙的2006- ♀ (113 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 20:13:01

• 回复：你找律师了吗?我把信放在单位了,等我看看告诉你IO的号码 -tom2007- ♂ (27 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 20:20:35

• 我看了IO的号码和你的一样,哈哈,看来我们是一条船上的了 -繁忙的2006- ♀ (36 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 20:18:23