(ZT)国务院的最新解释

那个律师又跟国务院联系了以下，这是他的最新说法。
总之，国务院搞了半天，有兜回到原先的说法上。即因为A3人太多，所以都给了他们。
就是按PD来。如果以后都是这样，咱们中国人永无出头之日了，因为A3实在太多，就是
全世界14万全部给他们，也不够。

This is the post from Ron:

I have to confess error and make a correction. The AC21 legislation changed
things far more that I suspected and changed the allocation process from
what I had learned previously. In further corresondence with the Visa Office
, I've learned that I was wrong about how numbers are moved from worldwide
to single state allocations. The following is a direct quote:


Quote:
Employment First Preference example: Annual limit 40,000 - (expected) 25,000
("rest of world") - 3,300 (China limit) - 3,300 (India limit) = 8,400
unused numbers. Those 8,400 numbers could be made available to China/India
applicants without regard to their normal 3,300 per-country limit for that
category. But those extra numbers would need to be made available to China/
India applicants on an equal basis, and in doing so making sure that the
additional number use would not result in the Worldwide annual limit being
exceeded. Thus, the same cut-off date for each country since the extra
numbers must be made available in priority date order without regard to
country.

I apologize for the confusion generated by my earlier remarks

所有跟帖： 

• 刚刚又捐了$100给LIA。谢谢组织LIA的同学们付出的努力。 -悄悄话提醒- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/18/2008 postreply 16:21:38

• 回复：(ZT)国务院的最新解释 -balsam_pear_k- ♂ (138 bytes) () 03/18/2008 postreply 17:01:42

• 装嘲卖傻， 骗小孩！一贯几两。 -nzh- ♂ (190 bytes) () 03/18/2008 postreply 19:51:24

• 回复：(ZT)国务院的最新解释 -blueswan- ♀ (34 bytes) () 03/18/2008 postreply 21:44:18