The problem is the 7% per-country rules changed.

来源: 2008-03-15 12:44:41 [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读:

The unused EB4&5 should give to EB1
The unused EB1 should give to EB2
The unused EB2 should give to EB3
Indian are 8 times more than Chinese.( it is true if you do some research about perm stats) Without 7.1% per-country limitation, Chinese will put in the same line with Indian.

-----------------
EMPLOYMENT-BASED PREFERENCES

First: Priority Workers: 28.6% of the worldwide employment-based preference level, plus any numbers not required for fourth and fifth preferences.

Second: Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Persons of Exceptional Ability: 28.6% of the worldwide employment-based preference level, plus any numbers not required by first preference.

Third: Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Other Workers: 28.6% of the worldwide level, plus any numbers not required by first and second preferences, not more than 10,000 of which to "Other Workers".

Fourth: Certain Special Immigrants: 7.1% of the worldwide level.

Fifth: Employment Creation: 7.1% of the worldwide level, not less than 3,000 of which reserved for investors in a targeted rural or high-unemployment area, and 3,000 set aside for investors in regional centers by Sec. 610 of P.L. 102-395.

4. INA Section 203(e) provides that family-sponsored