是从现在到9/30/2007,GC不会再有人被批准了,对吗?
所有跟帖:
•
回复:是从现在到9/30/2007,GC不会再有人被批准了,对吗?
-doshexh-
♀
(67 bytes)
()
07/02/2007 postreply
10:22:01
•
Not necessarily true. Depends how USCIS allocates visa.
-afewgoodman-
♀
(331 bytes)
()
07/02/2007 postreply
10:27:33
•
回复:Not necessarily true. Depends how USCIS allocates visa.
-GuaHaoBa-
♂
(85 bytes)
()
07/02/2007 postreply
10:34:26
•
回复:回复:是从现在到9/30/2007,GC不会再有人被批准了,对吗?
-485485-
♀
(237 bytes)
()
07/02/2007 postreply
10:28:15
•
回复:回复:回复:是从现在到9/30/2007,GC不会再有人被批准了,对吗?
-GCrequest-
♀
(175 bytes)
()
07/02/2007 postreply
10:32:03
•
sigh, that's true.
-使劲等-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
07/02/2007 postreply
10:37:06
•
It is true for EB-based GC because no numbers this fiscal year!
-GuaHaoBa-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
07/02/2007 postreply
10:29:14
•
不是。已经assign visa number(A#)的不影响
-使劲等-
♀
(287 bytes)
()
07/02/2007 postreply
10:36:06
•
A# is not visa number. Wake up!
-afewgoodman-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
07/02/2007 postreply
10:38:14
•
回复:
-poiuytre-
♀
(115 bytes)
()
07/02/2007 postreply
10:40:13
•
USCIS allocates visa number either by batch or one-by-one while
-afewgoodman-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
07/02/2007 postreply
10:44:35
•
How come"移民局上月使用了近6万个职业移民名额"
-sfcdmu-
♂
(102 bytes)
()
07/02/2007 postreply
10:47:53
•
是不会再有人被批准了
-hypercell-
♂
(567 bytes)
()
07/02/2007 postreply
11:00:29