楼上的发贴，对INA原文条款的编排不便于阅读，重新贴了在此

Immigrant membership in totalitarian party.-


(i) In general.-Any immigrant who is or has been a member of or affiliated with the Communist or any other totalitarian party (or subdivision or affiliate thereof), domestic or foreign, is inadmissible.


(ii) Exception for involuntary membership.- Clause (i) shall not apply to an alien because of membership or affiliation if the alien establishes to the satisfaction of the consular officer when applying for a visa (or to the satisfaction of the Attorney General when applying for admission) that the membership or affiliation is or was involuntary, or is or was solely when under 16 years of age, by operation of law, or for purposes of obtaining employment, food rations, or other essentials of living and whether necessary for such purposes.


(iii) Exception for past membership.-Clause (i) shall not apply to an alien because of membership or affiliation if the alien establishes to the satisfaction of the consular officer when applying for a visa (or to the satisfaction of the Attorney General when applying for admission) that-



(I) the membership or affiliation terminated at least-



(a) 2 years before the date of such application, or



(b) 5 years before the date of such application, in the case of an alien whose membership or affiliation was with the party controlling the government of a foreign state that is a totalitarian dictatorship as of such date, and



(II) the alien is not a threat to the security of the United States.



(iv) Exception for close family members.-The Attorney General may, in the Attorney General's discretion, waive the application of clause (i) in the case of an immigrant who is the parent, spouse, son, daughter, brother, or sister of a citizen of the United States or a spouse, son, or daughter of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence for humanitarian purposes, to assure family unity, or when it is otherwise in the public interest if the immigrant is not a threat to the security of the United States.
原文已经阐述了不适用于脱离五年以上的CP member,以及由于家庭成员是公民或永久居民的情况，请问这里有何误导？说了必须要有利美国利益了吗？
引用别人的话，不同时show上下文的因果关系，只能被理解为是蓄意割裂和曲解，更不是帮助别人的态度

所有跟帖： 

• 本来我回贴的目的，是为了回复“沉默是金”网友，如果你有其它 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (166 bytes) () 05/27/2007 postreply 15:21:51

• 赞一句小白兔, 很professional -toosad- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/27/2007 postreply 15:24:24

• 很professional? LMAO! -myturnnow- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/27/2007 postreply 21:33:35

• 最起码比你更PROFESSIONAL,更厚道,查查你俩的发言就一清二楚 -灌水专用名- ♂ (87 bytes) () 05/27/2007 postreply 22:56:00

• 回复：楼上的发贴，对INA原文条款的编排不便于阅读，重新贴了在此 -myturnnow- ♂ (111 bytes) () 05/27/2007 postreply 21:32:57