最新消息: 打官司没用了, 关于NC背景调查. SH!T

USCIS Clarifies Criteria to Expedite FBI Name Check.

The USCIS says that it will no longer "routinely" request the FBI to expedite a name check when the only reason for the request is because a mandamus (WOM) or other federal court petition is filed in the case.

Given the use of the word "routinely," it is possible that the USCIS could still make an expedite request in certain exceptional cases.

公民NC官司不行了, 不知道485官司还能打否:

http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/ExpediteNameChk022007.pdf

所有跟帖： 

• 给顶置一下吧, 想打官司的别浪费钱和精力了. 此路不通了. -捞一把- ♀ (0 bytes) () 02/27/2007 postreply 17:13:39

• 不赞成这种说法，又到了另一个极端，大家本来就没有指望移民局 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (352 bytes) () 02/27/2007 postreply 17:58:14

• 起诉的过程也是提醒CIS/FBI不要把原告的NC扔在一边忘/丢掉 -ITWorker0214- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/27/2007 postreply 18:15:35

• Several WOM cases actually were granted by Judge -d_outside- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/27/2007 postreply 19:33:50

• Yes,quite a few Orders favoring plaintiff granted -ITWorker0214- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/27/2007 postreply 19:54:42

• can u give some examples? as far as i knew, -selang1999- ♂ (42 bytes) () 02/27/2007 postreply 20:12:11

• 我又有信心打官司了. 想给父母办绿卡, 孩子5个月了, 希望父母带过一 -捞一把- ♀ (0 bytes) () 02/28/2007 postreply 00:31:33

• Why people like to scare themselves? -newfei2008- ♂ (80 bytes) () 02/27/2007 postreply 21:55:39

• Wom should still work for FBI -Tatung- ♂ (149 bytes) () 02/28/2007 postreply 00:34:38