当事律师的分析.

回答: 给大家个故事看看取消个递解令多难.乱讲2006-10-05 07:31:45

CARL 是个非常POWERFUL 的律师,他能把这个故事捅到Los Angeles Times 本事就不一般. 一般律师很难把一个BIA FINAL而且联邦法院没有管辖权的案子送到上诉法院并赢得上诉法院的支持. 下面是他对今天移民法厅再次盼决的分析.
The hardship in the Cabrera case is much stronger than it was when the Immigration Judge first granted their case in 2002. If the Immigration Judge again grants the Cabreras' application for Cancellation of Removal, his decision will be final unless the government attorney again appeals the Judge's decision.
Given the strength of this case, this would seem to be unlikely. However, in Los Angeles, the government automatically appeals the Judge's decision in Cancellation cases no matter how strong the case is.


I can not stop my tear every time I read the story. I will let you know the final outcome as soon possible.
Immigrant court is much more difficult to handle than some person here though of. Evere year, only a handleful of cases that are granted hardship green card because of the difficulty of meeting the hardship standard.
As claimed by the lawer, in Los Angeles, the government automatically appeals the Judge's decision in Cancellation cases no matter how strong the case is. Most part of the coutry also follow a similar pattern with the Cancellation cases.

所有跟帖: 

The last part is my 感想. -mytwocents- 给 mytwocents 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/05/2006 postreply 12:05:18

一打回车就发出去了. -mytwocents- 给 mytwocents 发送悄悄话 (237 bytes) () 10/05/2006 postreply 12:10:38

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!