回复:Ok--Two points

First, If the chinese attorney help him do the illegal paperwork on the purpose, he/she would lose his/her licence and also he/she could not charge only $3000 for 140 and 485 both for illegal person who apply GC, he could definitely charge more than that. The immigration officer is not so stupid not to check applicant record.

-- I140/I485 filed for EB1 (although the guy is BS holder) is not illegal. Everybody could file EB1. The apps may not be qualified, but they are legal. It is also legal to file GC apps on behalf of illegal immigrants. Yes, the officers do check the qualification, but it does take time to process. I cannot see any problem solely based on the story told.


Second, Nobody would like to pay $ 30,000 to get a job which kill chicken, if your story said he got $30,000 per year kill-chicken job, it would be more reasonable.
-- if $30k + chick-killer job for a GC, that is reasonable.

所有跟帖: 

回复:回复:Ok--Two points -Gongdao1- 给 Gongdao1 发送悄悄话 (74 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 15:54:21

In stupid people's mind, everyone else is stupid. -lkenlken- 给 lkenlken 发送悄悄话 (27 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 15:56:34

Other stupid guy speaking out -Gongdao1- 给 Gongdao1 发送悄悄话 (38 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 15:58:07

回复:回复:回复:Ok--Two points -balsam_pear_k- 给 balsam_pear_k 发送悄悄话 (186 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 15:57:44

my last statement -Gongdao1- 给 Gongdao1 发送悄悄话 (208 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 16:04:31

回复:my last statement -balsam_pear_k- 给 balsam_pear_k 发送悄悄话 (131 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 16:11:20

Ok, other last statement -Gongdao1- 给 Gongdao1 发送悄悄话 (86 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 16:17:34

官僚主义和腐败完全是两回事 -xiaobaitu- 给 xiaobaitu 发送悄悄话 xiaobaitu 的博客首页 (800 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 16:04:23

回复:官僚主义和腐败完全是两回事 -balsam_pear_k- 给 balsam_pear_k 发送悄悄话 (60 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 16:06:36

回复:官僚主义和腐败完全是两回事 -balsam_pear_k- 给 balsam_pear_k 发送悄悄话 (60 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 16:07:08

对中国人的严苛和对别国人的宽容 -mythoughtsa- 给 mythoughtsa 发送悄悄话 (106 bytes) () 09/08/2006 postreply 16:25:53

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!