回复:there is no 100% for anything. Contingency happens

来源: pr 2006-08-31 10:52:28 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (264 bytes)
回答: 回复:mytwocents/howdy/xiaobaitu, please!pr2006-08-31 10:31:05
Yes, I can not say it is 100%. What I mean is that with 245(a)/(k), overystaying and w/o work permit should not be an issue as long as it is less 180 days. But why it is still case by case, and there is chance that AOS could be denied because of those two reasons?

所有跟帖: 

No body can guarantee that a officer must not deny you -mytwocents- 给 mytwocents 发送悄悄话 (184 bytes) () 08/31/2006 postreply 11:42:59

what is MTR? -pr- 给 pr 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 08/31/2006 postreply 11:46:29

Motion to reopen or motion to reconsideration -mytwocents- 给 mytwocents 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 08/31/2006 postreply 11:48:50

245(k) is not a case by case issue. -mytwocents- 给 mytwocents 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 08/31/2006 postreply 12:04:06

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”