It is hard to understand. My understanding may be not precise.

来源: mytwocents 于 2005-12-29 11:31:02 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (344 bytes)
回答: Correction only about history 由 mytwocents 于 2005-12-29 08:55:27

If a person's H/L employment authorization is still valid, if he/she did not leave (the H/L sponsor), and if he/de came back with an AP, working without an EAD is legal until the final rule is published (never happen since then)

Note: only people with a 485 pending and using AP to come back will be called paroled adjustment applicant.

所有跟帖： 

• 回复：It is hard to understand. My understanding may be not prec -65218- ♀ 给 65218 发送悄悄话 (127 bytes) () 12/29/2005 postreply 12:00:25

• No, definite not, considering the context -mytwocents- ♂ 给 mytwocents 发送悄悄话 (453 bytes) () 12/29/2005 postreply 12:13:21

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！