NIW standards

I read a lot of the AAO cases, INS seems take the number of citations very seriouly. if there is not many citations, a number of independent letters sometimes convinced them, but not all the time. in the cases they denied, AAO argue that the independent witness did not specify how the petitioner's work influenced their research.

one thing I found if that INS is not consistent in the third prong.

所有跟帖: 

回复:NIW standards -sdfsdfsdff- 给 sdfsdfsdff 发送悄悄话 (368 bytes) () 10/19/2005 postreply 13:08:43

回复:NIW standards -bigjerry- 给 bigjerry 发送悄悄话 (51 bytes) () 10/19/2005 postreply 17:54:25

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!