Do you think what I said is not reasonable?

来源: MartinLu2003315 于 2007-05-30 12:30:58 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (0 bytes)

所有跟帖： 

• thanks for info -julydue- ♀ 给 julydue 发送悄悄话 (199 bytes) () 05/30/2007 postreply 12:34:37

• 回复：thanks for info -灌水专用名- ♂ 给 灌水专用名 发送悄悄话 (168 bytes) () 05/30/2007 postreply 12:40:03

• 谢谢，正是我想确认的，符合2，完全放心了。 -julydue- ♀ 给 julydue 发送悄悄话 (10 bytes) () 05/30/2007 postreply 12:41:56

• 现在140超过365天的好象很少见,祝你好运! -灌水专用名- ♂ 给 灌水专用名 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 05/30/2007 postreply 12:43:08

• 所以比较倒霉，遇上background check了，pending>365days -julydue- ♀ 给 julydue 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 05/30/2007 postreply 12:45:19

• 回复：所以比较倒霉，遇上background check了，pending>365days -huqic- ♀ 给 huqic 发送悄悄话 (40 bytes) () 05/30/2007 postreply 13:26:56

• Based on my understanding, PERM does not need 365 days, -MartinLu2003315- ♂ 给 MartinLu2003315 发送悄悄话 (83 bytes) () 05/30/2007 postreply 13:28:15

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！