Richardman “富人”请进

来源: 2025-07-28 20:58:47 [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读:

抱歉兄弟,发现昨天回你有关Sharpe Ratio的帖子计算有错误。原公式中收益是年收益,而标准差则应该是月收益统计的标准差,这个许多资料中都没讲,我今天挖了很深才搞清楚。改正后计算出的Sharpe Ratio应该没有什么问题。两个例子,纳指和标普500计算出的Sharpe Ratio如下(假设无风险回报是4%),似乎都还合理。再次抱歉没有完全搞清楚就发言了。握手。

纳指:

Since 2009  
  Mean 18.13%
  Standard deviation 5.10%
  Sharp Ratio 2.77
     
Past 10 years  
  Mean 18.08%
  Standard deviation 5.33%
  Sharp Ratio 2.64
     
Past 5 years  
  Mean 14.01%
  Standard deviation 5.62%
  Sharp Ratio 1.78
     
Past 3 years  
  Mean 27.25%
  Standard deviation 4.74%
  Sharp Ratio 4.91
     
Mean is for annual return;  
Standard deviation is for monthly return.

 

标普500

Since 2009  
  Mean 12.80%
  Standard deviation 4.38%
  Sharp Ratio 2.01
     
Past 10 years  
  Mean 13.15%
  Standard deviation 4.45%
  Sharp Ratio 2.06
     
Past 5 years  
  Mean 12.73%
  Standard deviation 4.54%
  Sharp Ratio 1.92
     
Past 3 years  
  Mean 18.73%
  Standard deviation 3.68%
  Sharp Ratio 4.00
     
Mean is for annual return;  
Standard deviation is for monthly return.