我DIY的EB1a和NIW 去年下半年交到TSC，今年5月1号被一起转到NSC，今天收到EB1a的
RFE，但是内容却是针对NIW的。实在是不知道该怎样处理。恳请建议。
Additional evidence is requried in order to evaluate eligibility for a
national interest waiver pursuant to the tests established in Matter of New
York Dept of Transportation, 22I&N Dec. 215 (Comm. 1998). (Please note: the
evidence already submitted demonstrates that the proposed employment has
substantial intrinsic merit).
Please submit documentary evidence to establish that the benefits of your
proposed employment with XYZ Company will be national in scope.
Please submit documentary evidence to establish that you have a past record
of specific prior achievement that justifies projections of future benefit
to the national interest. You must establish, in some capacity, your ability
to serve the national interest to a substantially greater extent than the
majority of your peers. You must demonstrate, to some degree, your influence
on your field of employment as a whole.
我查了一下， 这个New York Dept of Transportation, 22I&N Dec. 215 (Comm. 1998) 是关于NIW的。我觉得有两种可能，
1. IO 看的是我的EB1a材料，却当成了NIW来审核，当然发现材料里没有任何和NIW相关
的内容，就发了这么一个RFE.
2. IO看的是NIW材料，想发一个关于National interest的RFE，结果发到了EB1a case
上。
我仔细检查，发现这个receipt number确实是EB1a的。 但不管怎样，这个RFE我该怎样
回呢？一种选择是把EB1a的材料再交一遍，同时强调是EB1a，让IO重审，但是很可能IO
一看和RFE 的National Interest没有任何关系，直接就据了。另一种是将错就错，就
把NIW的petition letter摘要加上NIW的推荐信交上去，看IO会不会也将错就错把EB1a
批了。
另外请问EB1a的RFE一定要不同的推荐人吗？我有同样的推荐人的NIW版本的推荐信，可以改改日期直接交上去吗？找推荐人是件非常麻烦费时的事情。
恳请大家建议。先谢过了.
（BTW, 在问了一下，得到的建议是就RFE问什么就答什么；不过还是想借文学城的人气再问一下）
RFE，但是内容却是针对NIW的。实在是不知道该怎样处理。恳请建议。
Additional evidence is requried in order to evaluate eligibility for a
national interest waiver pursuant to the tests established in Matter of New
York Dept of Transportation, 22I&N Dec. 215 (Comm. 1998). (Please note: the
evidence already submitted demonstrates that the proposed employment has
substantial intrinsic merit).
Please submit documentary evidence to establish that the benefits of your
proposed employment with XYZ Company will be national in scope.
Please submit documentary evidence to establish that you have a past record
of specific prior achievement that justifies projections of future benefit
to the national interest. You must establish, in some capacity, your ability
to serve the national interest to a substantially greater extent than the
majority of your peers. You must demonstrate, to some degree, your influence
on your field of employment as a whole.
我查了一下， 这个New York Dept of Transportation, 22I&N Dec. 215 (Comm. 1998) 是关于NIW的。我觉得有两种可能，
1. IO 看的是我的EB1a材料，却当成了NIW来审核，当然发现材料里没有任何和NIW相关
的内容，就发了这么一个RFE.
2. IO看的是NIW材料，想发一个关于National interest的RFE，结果发到了EB1a case
上。
我仔细检查，发现这个receipt number确实是EB1a的。 但不管怎样，这个RFE我该怎样
回呢？一种选择是把EB1a的材料再交一遍，同时强调是EB1a，让IO重审，但是很可能IO
一看和RFE 的National Interest没有任何关系，直接就据了。另一种是将错就错，就
把NIW的petition letter摘要加上NIW的推荐信交上去，看IO会不会也将错就错把EB1a
批了。
另外请问EB1a的RFE一定要不同的推荐人吗？我有同样的推荐人的NIW版本的推荐信，可以改改日期直接交上去吗？找推荐人是件非常麻烦费时的事情。
恳请大家建议。先谢过了.
（BTW, 在问了一下，得到的建议是就RFE问什么就答什么；不过还是想借文学城的人气再问一下）
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”
