NSC EB1A RFE （7/15 PP, 7/24 RFE FAX notice）
Background:
Title: Research Scientist, in the fields of Cancer research, environmental health (nanoparticle toxicology), not TOP US university
Articles: 17, citation: 40
National award for PhD student (China), supervisor of the winner of US national junior award, & Intel International science Award
Associate Editor, and editor board of two Chinese journals
Review: 77 manuscripts for 7 national and international journals
References: 8 (US 7, France 1; 2 independent references; 5 of them are from Chinese)
RFE details:
The evidence you have ted does not establish eligibility for this very restrictive visa classification. You must submit additional evidence that demonstrates that you have garnered sustained national or international acclaim and that your achievements have been recognized as extraordinary by others in the field. Extraordinary ability is defined as “a level of expertise indicating that the individual is one of the small percentage who have risen to the very top of the field of endeavor.” Title 8, code for federal regulations section 204, 5(h)(3) describes the types of evidence that may be submitted to establish eligibility under this classification.
The record indicates that you submitted evidence relating to the following criteria: I, II， III, iv, v, vi, and viii.
i) The record contains evidence that you received the XXX scholarship, a grant for your XXX proposal, and that you supervised a winner of US Stockholm Junior water prize.
Please submit documentary evidence of any additional awards received, along with documentary evidence which establishes the eligibility and criteria for winning the award or prize. Also submit documentary evidence to establish the reputation of the organization granting the award and any other documentary evidence to establish the significance of the award or prize.
ii) The record contains evidence establishing that you are a member of Sigma Xi, XXX, and AAAS.
Please submit the section of the constitution or bylaws which states the membership criteria.
iii) The record contains evidence that your work has been cited.
Please note: to meet this criterion, among other requirements, the article must be primarily about you and your work. Any articles that briefly cite your work will be considered under the “authorship” criterion below. Please submit any published material about you in professional or major trade publications or other major media, relating to your work in the field. Please submit documentary evidence to establish the significance of the publication in which the article appears.
iv) the record contains evidence that you have served as an editor of the electronic journal of biology, and reviewed manuscripts for other publications.
Please submit documentation of the criteria for selection as an editor and reviewer.
v) The record contains statements attesting to your original contributions.
Please submit objective documentary evidence of your contributions and the significance of each contribution to the field.
vi) the record contains copies of your scholarly articles.
Please submit copies of any additional published articles by other researchers citing or otherwisely recognizing your research and/or contributions. (citing articles may have been published after the filing date) please highlight the portion of the paper that references your work and highlight your name in the bibliography or “works cited” section. Please also provide a translation for any foreign language documents. It is not necessary to submit the entire article; however, you should provide at least the title page and the relevant pages which include the citation, as well as the entire references section. In the alternative, you may also submit printouts of search results from such websites as scifinder and google scholar, just to name two. Please note that any such printout must contain the title, authors, and publication information for both the cited and citing article. Search results that do not contain such details will not be considered evidence.
vii) this creterion does not apply to your field of endeavor.
viii) the record contains evidence of your work with the XX institute at XXX University. Please submit documentary evidence to establish how your performance is/was extraordinary relative to others in parallel positions or more senior positions in the organization.
ix) The record contains your 2007 and 2008 income tax return…..
x) This criterion does not apply to your field of endeavor.
Finally, the regulations allow for the submission of comparable evidence if the above standards do not readily apply to your occupation. However, for any such comparable evidence to be considered, it must be established that the above criteria are not applicable to your field of endeavor. It is also noted that the mere submission of evidence relating to three or more of the above items may not establish eligibility for this classification. As previously mentioned, the evidence must demonstrate that you have garnered sustained national or international acclaim and that you achievements have been recognized as extraordinary by others in the field.
请了律师，沟通和服务都算很职业。claim了7条。第8条律师附上税表并没想claim,因为生物postdog的工资高也高不到哪里去，而且我的并不高。
当天知道消息后，自是非常郁闷，毕竟准备EB1A到投寄，已经是绞尽脑汁精疲力尽了。一开始觉得毫无办法，后来再静下心来仔细读RFE，及到处收集的RFE做参考，感觉有一下几点教训和体会，也许不尽然，愿意与各位同道及绿大侠们分享学习：
1） 首先，不应该claim那些比较勉强的项目。现在看来，多而不强还不如少而精。有一些同道认为claim多了反而有负面的影响，更容易被RFE；
2）我打算只侧重3-4点，看能否在挖些纸面的证据；
3）推荐信我认为中国人的太多，而且有2副教授。。想再找几个推荐信，虽然很难。大家认为会有用否？
4）其他的几点，尽可能地象对待文章审稿人的意见那样，逐条回答（虽然目前还不知如何做）。
最近因为这RFE，工作和生活都有影响，明知这样不好，可有能如何？本不是很想留待美国，只是既然花钱请律师做了，那就尽最大的努力了。
各位还在RFE的，已经RFE并通过了的，和早就拿到卡的xdjm,非常愿意得到你们的想法分享，建设性的意见，或是 RFE模板、消息分享。同样，我也会常常更新我的帖子，分析我的一些收获。
谢谢各位，祝 大家都一个好的一天！
Background:
Title: Research Scientist, in the fields of Cancer research, environmental health (nanoparticle toxicology), not TOP US university
Articles: 17, citation: 40
National award for PhD student (China), supervisor of the winner of US national junior award, & Intel International science Award
Associate Editor, and editor board of two Chinese journals
Review: 77 manuscripts for 7 national and international journals
References: 8 (US 7, France 1; 2 independent references; 5 of them are from Chinese)
RFE details:
The evidence you have ted does not establish eligibility for this very restrictive visa classification. You must submit additional evidence that demonstrates that you have garnered sustained national or international acclaim and that your achievements have been recognized as extraordinary by others in the field. Extraordinary ability is defined as “a level of expertise indicating that the individual is one of the small percentage who have risen to the very top of the field of endeavor.” Title 8, code for federal regulations section 204, 5(h)(3) describes the types of evidence that may be submitted to establish eligibility under this classification.
The record indicates that you submitted evidence relating to the following criteria: I, II， III, iv, v, vi, and viii.
i) The record contains evidence that you received the XXX scholarship, a grant for your XXX proposal, and that you supervised a winner of US Stockholm Junior water prize.
Please submit documentary evidence of any additional awards received, along with documentary evidence which establishes the eligibility and criteria for winning the award or prize. Also submit documentary evidence to establish the reputation of the organization granting the award and any other documentary evidence to establish the significance of the award or prize.
ii) The record contains evidence establishing that you are a member of Sigma Xi, XXX, and AAAS.
Please submit the section of the constitution or bylaws which states the membership criteria.
iii) The record contains evidence that your work has been cited.
Please note: to meet this criterion, among other requirements, the article must be primarily about you and your work. Any articles that briefly cite your work will be considered under the “authorship” criterion below. Please submit any published material about you in professional or major trade publications or other major media, relating to your work in the field. Please submit documentary evidence to establish the significance of the publication in which the article appears.
iv) the record contains evidence that you have served as an editor of the electronic journal of biology, and reviewed manuscripts for other publications.
Please submit documentation of the criteria for selection as an editor and reviewer.
v) The record contains statements attesting to your original contributions.
Please submit objective documentary evidence of your contributions and the significance of each contribution to the field.
vi) the record contains copies of your scholarly articles.
Please submit copies of any additional published articles by other researchers citing or otherwisely recognizing your research and/or contributions. (citing articles may have been published after the filing date) please highlight the portion of the paper that references your work and highlight your name in the bibliography or “works cited” section. Please also provide a translation for any foreign language documents. It is not necessary to submit the entire article; however, you should provide at least the title page and the relevant pages which include the citation, as well as the entire references section. In the alternative, you may also submit printouts of search results from such websites as scifinder and google scholar, just to name two. Please note that any such printout must contain the title, authors, and publication information for both the cited and citing article. Search results that do not contain such details will not be considered evidence.
vii) this creterion does not apply to your field of endeavor.
viii) the record contains evidence of your work with the XX institute at XXX University. Please submit documentary evidence to establish how your performance is/was extraordinary relative to others in parallel positions or more senior positions in the organization.
ix) The record contains your 2007 and 2008 income tax return…..
x) This criterion does not apply to your field of endeavor.
Finally, the regulations allow for the submission of comparable evidence if the above standards do not readily apply to your occupation. However, for any such comparable evidence to be considered, it must be established that the above criteria are not applicable to your field of endeavor. It is also noted that the mere submission of evidence relating to three or more of the above items may not establish eligibility for this classification. As previously mentioned, the evidence must demonstrate that you have garnered sustained national or international acclaim and that you achievements have been recognized as extraordinary by others in the field.
请了律师，沟通和服务都算很职业。claim了7条。第8条律师附上税表并没想claim,因为生物postdog的工资高也高不到哪里去，而且我的并不高。
当天知道消息后，自是非常郁闷，毕竟准备EB1A到投寄，已经是绞尽脑汁精疲力尽了。一开始觉得毫无办法，后来再静下心来仔细读RFE，及到处收集的RFE做参考，感觉有一下几点教训和体会，也许不尽然，愿意与各位同道及绿大侠们分享学习：
1） 首先，不应该claim那些比较勉强的项目。现在看来，多而不强还不如少而精。有一些同道认为claim多了反而有负面的影响，更容易被RFE；
2）我打算只侧重3-4点，看能否在挖些纸面的证据；
3）推荐信我认为中国人的太多，而且有2副教授。。想再找几个推荐信，虽然很难。大家认为会有用否？
4）其他的几点，尽可能地象对待文章审稿人的意见那样，逐条回答（虽然目前还不知如何做）。
最近因为这RFE，工作和生活都有影响，明知这样不好，可有能如何？本不是很想留待美国，只是既然花钱请律师做了，那就尽最大的努力了。
各位还在RFE的，已经RFE并通过了的，和早就拿到卡的xdjm,非常愿意得到你们的想法分享，建设性的意见，或是 RFE模板、消息分享。同样，我也会常常更新我的帖子，分析我的一些收获。
谢谢各位，祝 大家都一个好的一天！
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”
