回复：请教 WorthIt 等专家：EB1a 140 RFE

要求补充下面几条：

1) Evidence which indicate that the award for Progress in Science and technology granted by the Chinese Academy of Sciences constittutes a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award;

这一条我在网上下载了奖励条例的中文文件，翻译了其中一部分，另外在请国内原单位出具一封信，解释一下这个奖的评选标准及过程 （这封信最初递交了，有必要再更新一下吗？）。由于这一条十分重要，还能提供其它什么证据吗？

Got to prepare this one very well. Update the information. In the letter from China, you should indicate that the award is at the national level, reserved for top scientists in the field and the competition is open to all scientists in the field in China (not limited to a small group of scientist).


2) Evidence that the beneficiary's work has attracted significant interest from academic institutions, from government, or from industry in the form of major research grants or funding awards;

有一个美国小的Grant的和出国前几个中国的Grants，准备了。其他的几个都是参加课题研究，让PI写了证明信不知道有没有用？

All these should be helpful. You may need to emphysize that the grants were awarded due to your significant contributions.

(This is not one of the ten requirements. Why need grants?)

3) Articles or exvcerpts from trade publications, journals, or magzines in which the beneficiary's achivements are commented on by his peers; or copies or trans of major media items (newspaper articles, radio or TV spots, etc.) in which the beneficiary is mentioned by name.

这一条没有直接的证据，但有媒体采访总课题首席科学家的报道，我是其中一个子课题主持人，报道中根本没有替我的名字。这个报道有用吗？

You may say directly that you are not claim this one, but since the importance of your work you participated, the PI was reported. and your work has been cited by scientists around the world.

另外我满足了其他几条：比如是多个杂志的审稿人，研究成果的原创性（原来提交了多封来自政府部门和其他独立推荐人的推荐信）。在这次RFE中是否要重新提供一遍这些证据？需要更多推荐信吗？

Provide a few letters would help too. Highlight these items you claim to be satisfied.