What you said makes some sense. After all

the regulation does not address the situation after using AP. That is why I said that the director of the international officer may do it for your safety.
Can we think a bit differently.
1. If she did not use AP, it is no problem for her to use OPT, because she can be considered as F1 or AOS either way.
2. After used her AP, she is on AOS. The regulation extends the work authrization from OPT to AOS. Under this situation, her status is no doubt AOS, but the EAD from OPT automatically turns to a one based on AOS.
The regulation mentions nothing about another status must exist to support her use of EAD from OPT. So I think that her lawyer is right on the intepretation of the regulation.

所有跟帖： 

• 回复：What you said makes some sense. After all -F1EAD- ♀ (530 bytes) () 02/28/2006 postreply 11:49:56