这个左派砖家搞一堆废数据，企图吓唬怕数据统计的人

哪有那么复杂，哪有那么多假研究。

简单看税率就够了：

1) 川普提议的

Brackets & Rates for Married-Joint filers:
Less than $75,000: 12%
More than $75,000 but less than $225,000: 25%
More than $225,000: 33%

2) 现有的税率 (看中间那一竖行)

Table 1. 2016 Taxable Income Brackets and Rates (Estimate)
Rate	Single Filers	Married Joint Filers	Head of Household Filers
10%	$0 to $9,275	$0 to $18,550	$0 to $13,250
15%	$9,275 to $37,650	$18,550 to $75,300	$13,250 to $50,400
25%	$37,650 to $91,150	$75,300 to $151,900	$50,400 to $130,150
28%	$91,150 to $190,150	$151,900 to $231,450	$130,150 to $210,800
33%	$190,150 to $413,350	$231,450 to $413,350	$210,800 to $413,350
35%	$413,350 to $415,050	$413,350 to $466,950	$413,350 to $441,000
39.6%	$415,050+	$466,950+

所以对中产阶级，是12%(川)和15%(希)的差别，或是25%(川)和28%(希)的差别。

川普还要提高标准扣除额，只会是好事。

文章故意用一个特例，就是子女特别多的家庭(5个以上)，这种家庭基本上是西裔/非裔家庭，根本不能代表中产阶级。

文章说，川普会eliminate "personal exemption"，当一个家庭子女有5个以上时，川普提高的标准扣除额就不划算了。

但是文章故意忽略川普的原话：

• Eliminates the personal exemption and introduces other childcare-related tax provisions.

左派学者惯使的伎俩