如果你认为95%以上认为全球变暖是人类制造的话不算共识的话,我也没话可说。 (变暖本身是另外一个问题; % would be higher)
当然真理也许掌握在少数人手里,但是你不能把绝对多数说成七三开。
参见:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming
说说关于全球变暖的事实:
所有跟帖:
•
Where is the 95% number from? Please don't count me in.
-moreco2pls-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
11/21/2014 postreply
06:04:49
•
恭喜您,您肯定在5%之内,如果您认为坚持错误时间光荣的事儿,您就“光荣了”
-Chiyankun-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
11/21/2014 postreply
06:45:30
•
Blow up the chart on top right, addup the numbers; 95% is an un
-SwiperTheFox-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
11/21/2014 postreply
07:04:45
•
Where is the 95% number from? Please don't count me in.
-燕京十景-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
11/21/2014 postreply
06:46:42
•
Have to pat on my back on my ability of eyeballing
-SwiperTheFox-
♂
(366 bytes)
()
11/21/2014 postreply
07:09:29
•
You do realize that many key climate studies have been shown to
-燕京十景-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
11/21/2014 postreply
07:13:10
•
Depending on what you think is key. I would accept
-SwiperTheFox-
♂
(267 bytes)
()
11/21/2014 postreply
07:17:37
•
Global warming and GMO are no longer a scientific question, but
-燕京十景-
♀
(627 bytes)
()
11/21/2014 postreply
07:41:10
•
Sorry Telegraph is a news agency
-SwiperTheFox-
♂
(292 bytes)
()
11/21/2014 postreply
07:49:53
•
Telegraph cites peer-reviewed papers, if you care to dig into it
-燕京十景-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
11/21/2014 postreply
08:19:08
•
On a separate point, people should think about what risks they s
-SwiperTheFox-
♂
(454 bytes)
()
11/21/2014 postreply
07:22:01