那你怎么知道B21作战半径大于B2? 这个是澳大利亚政府智库战略研究所的报告,不是中媒,资料是美向澳提供的,建议澳购买

he USAF was as of 2016 also planning to acquire a new long-range fighter from its Next Generation Air Dominance program, known as the F-X or "Penetrating Counter-Air", to escort the B-21 deep into enemy territory and help it survive enemy air defenses and intercepting fighters.[64]

Possible Australian interest

In December 2022, an Australian Strategic Policy Institute report advocated acquiring a number of B-21 Raiders to provide the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) a greater long-range strike capability.[65]

The report stated that a B-21 could fly 2,500 miles (4,000 km) without refueling while carrying more munitions than the maximum 930-mile (1,500 km) range of the RAAF's F-35 fighter jets, which require air-to-air refueling for longer missions. A single B-21 can also deliver the same impact as several F-35As. Additionally, the B-21 can attack targets from secure air bases located in Australia's south, with greater proximity to more personnel, fuel, and munitions.[66]

During bilateral talks held in August 2022, it was reported that the US might allow Australia to procure the B-21. When asked if the US would consider allowing Australia to join in developing the B-21 bomber, USAF Secretary Frank Kendall stated, "I don't think that there's any fundamental limitation on the areas in which we can cooperate. If Australia had a requirement for long-range strike, then we'd be willing to have a conversation with them about that."[67] However, the Defence Strategic Review released by the Australian government on 24 April 2023 stated that the B-21 was not considered a suitable option for acquisition.[68] Australia will instead invest in upgrading its F-35As and F/A-18Fs to the latest Block 4 and Block III configurations, respectively, to enable both aircraft to launch the AGM-158C LRASM and the Joint Strike Missile.[69]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_Grumman_B-21_Raider#:~:text=The%20report%20stated%20that%20a,impact%20as%20several%20F%2D35As.?

 

 

 

所有跟帖: 

中文译文在这里 -天青水蓝- 给 天青水蓝 发送悄悄话 天青水蓝 的博客首页 (1766 bytes) () 02/18/2026 postreply 20:48:56

我认识的军迷都认为澳大利亚说的B21航程不可靠。美国不可能对一个智库透露这种机密,即使透露,对方也不会这样公然公布。 -晓筠- 给 晓筠 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 02/18/2026 postreply 21:48:43

里面说了美国的目的是建议澳大利亚政府购买,要做生意当然得告知准买家性能。当然美国外销的武器可能性能不如美军自用的型号 -天青水蓝- 给 天青水蓝 发送悄悄话 天青水蓝 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/18/2026 postreply 21:51:42

如果这样可能买家不会对外那么公然公布这种机密。 -晓筠- 给 晓筠 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 02/18/2026 postreply 21:53:43

澳洲政府经过研究已经决定不买B21了 -天青水蓝- 给 天青水蓝 发送悄悄话 天青水蓝 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/18/2026 postreply 21:59:33

告知之前一定会确认对方能够保密并且还会要对方签保密协定。因此对方不可能这样公然公布这种机密。 -晓筠- 给 晓筠 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 02/18/2026 postreply 21:57:46

一般认为B21是双发而B2是四发,因此B21远比B2省油。 -晓筠- 给 晓筠 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 02/18/2026 postreply 21:50:34

那可不一定,双发的B57作战半径1500公里,八台发动机的B52作战半径达到7200公里,要看飞机大小和机内油量 -天青水蓝- 给 天青水蓝 发送悄悄话 天青水蓝 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/18/2026 postreply 22:05:00

B2的造价是每架24亿美元,而B21按照官方说法只要5.5亿,说明B21要比B2小很多,机内燃油也会少不少 -天青水蓝- 给 天青水蓝 发送悄悄话 天青水蓝 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/18/2026 postreply 22:10:58

美国在发布B21时公开说B21可以从美国本土不需空中加油攻击地球上任何目标。 -晓筠- 给 晓筠 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 02/18/2026 postreply 21:52:24

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!