没有证据表明他“持枪”与警察对抗,大家要尊重事实。

回答: 那权利不是带枪去和警察对抗万里阳光照2026-01-28 14:50:59

所有跟帖: 

携枪可以,但需要有ID和Permit to carry. 但他两样都没有。更何况 -冷月亮- 给 冷月亮 发送悄悄话 (712 bytes) () 01/28/2026 postreply 15:05:55

He does have a license to carry -卡城风雨- 给 卡城风雨 发送悄悄话 (784 bytes) () 01/28/2026 postreply 15:10:39

did he carry id and ccw permit at the time of violence? -internuts- 给 internuts 发送悄悄话 internuts 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 01/28/2026 postreply 15:13:59

How is this relevant to the argument? -卡城风雨- 给 卡城风雨 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 01/28/2026 postreply 15:20:22

are u in the us? all states require those when carry a gun -internuts- 给 internuts 发送悄悄话 internuts 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 01/28/2026 postreply 15:24:39

The argument is if he should be killed. -卡城风雨- 给 卡城风雨 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 01/28/2026 postreply 15:29:26

yes he posed threat to the leo lives -internuts- 给 internuts 发送悄悄话 internuts 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 01/28/2026 postreply 15:42:05

他这样近距离阻挠agent执法已经是interfering with law enforcement, -灵动的双子- 给 灵动的双子 发送悄悄话 灵动的双子 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 01/28/2026 postreply 15:15:04

That is your call,not the jury's. 退一步说,即便是也不能成为被射杀的理由。 -卡城风雨- 给 卡城风雨 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 01/28/2026 postreply 15:18:18

如果是阻碍执法并被警告而不听,尤其是如此近距离靠近,那就要被逮捕,而在逮捕过程中发现有武器,而 -灵动的双子- 给 灵动的双子 发送悄悄话 灵动的双子 的博客首页 (69 bytes) () 01/28/2026 postreply 15:24:46

he was killed because he carried a gun and reached to it -internuts- 给 internuts 发送悄悄话 internuts 的博客首页 (101 bytes) () 01/28/2026 postreply 15:27:31

No evidence of "reached to it". 尼有证据可以拿出来 -卡城风雨- 给 卡城风雨 发送悄悄话 (34 bytes) () 01/28/2026 postreply 15:34:52

normally i don't answer questions like this, but i'll do one -internuts- 给 internuts 发送悄悄话 internuts 的博客首页 (430 bytes) () 01/28/2026 postreply 15:48:11

you claimed you have guns, and you don't know id cards req? -internuts- 给 internuts 发送悄悄话 internuts 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 01/28/2026 postreply 15:49:30

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!