当联邦官员在执行由联邦法律授权的职务时，（宪法）至高条款即适用

针对博维诺（Bovino）的保护： 这意味着，只要博维诺是在执行联邦法律（如移民法）授权的任务，地方检察官或法官就很难以“违反州法”为由对他定罪。这也就是所谓的**“联邦官员免疫权” (Supremacy Clause Immunity)**。

既然博维诺是 Operation Metro Surge 的前线指挥官，他所有的决策（包括搜查、逮捕、部署）都是以联邦法律为依据的。

 当民主党政客指控博维诺“恐吓社区”或“侵犯民权”时，至高条款确保了他是在**“为国办事”而非“个人犯罪”**。只要他的行为不被判定为“公然违法且与职责无关”，他就处于该条款的绝对保护之下。

 

This isn’t just wrong — it defies settled law.

David Schoen: “When federal officers are carrying out duties authorized by federal law, the Supremacy Clause applies.”

“That means immunity from state criminal prosecution — a principle settled since 1890.” pic.twitter.com/LXjIqyXMER

— Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) January 27, 2026

Settled law isn't a suggestion. David Schoen is reminding everyone that the Supremacy Clause has protected federal officers from state prosecution since 1890.