船铺有可能有意识要终止和大家拿的CUSMA贸易协定所以赞扬卡尼的车deal

In January 2026, Prime Minister Mark Carney signed a "landmark" trade agreement with China that reduced the 100% tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs) to a rate of 6.1% for a capped number of units (starting at 49,000 per year).¹

 

While the deal was framed as a way to help Canadian farmers (by ending retaliatory Chinese tariffs on canola) and increase EV affordability, it has faced significant criticism.² Here is why many believe it could be bad for Canada:

1. Threats to the Canadian Auto Industry

The heart of Canada’s manufacturing sector is the auto industry, largely based in Ontario.³

• Undercutting Domestic Investment: Canada recently invested billions of taxpayer dollars in subsidies to attract EV battery plants (like Volkswagen and Stellantis). Critics argue that allowing cheap, subsidized Chinese imports makes it harder for these new Canadian-made products to compete.⁴

• Job Security: Unions like Unifor have called the deal a "self-inflicted wound," fearing that if Chinese brands gain a foothold, it will lead to layoffs or the closure of Canadian assembly plants.⁵

2. Strain on U.S. Relations (CUSMA Risks)

The U.S. currently maintains a 100% tariff on Chinese EVs. By breaking away from this "lockstep" approach, Canada risks serious diplomatic and economic blowback from Washington.

• The "Backdoor" Concern: U.S. officials worry that Canada could become a "backdoor" for Chinese technology to enter the North American supply chain.⁶

• Trade Retaliation: There are fears that the U.S. could trigger "snapback" provisions or impose new duties on Canadian-made cars crossing the border if they contain Chinese components or are seen as undermining North American trade agreements (CUSMA).

3. National Security and Data Privacy

Modern EVs are essentially "computers on wheels" that collect massive amounts of data.⁷

• Cybersecurity: Ontario Premier Doug Ford and others have referred to these as "subsidized spy cars," expressing concerns that Chinese-made vehicle software could be used for surveillance or that the data could be accessed by the Chinese government.⁸

• Dependence on a Rival: Increasing reliance on Chinese technology for the green energy transition could give Beijing leverage over Canada's infrastructure in the future.

4. Human Rights and Unfair Competition

• State Subsidies: The 100% tariffs were originally put in place because China heavily subsidizes its EV industry, allowing them to sell cars at prices that Western companies (who follow market rules) cannot match.

• Labor Standards: There are ongoing concerns regarding labor practices in China’s EV and battery supply chains.⁹ Critics argue that by lowering tariffs, Canada is implicitly rewarding a system that does not adhere to the same environmental or human rights standards.

   

---

Summary Table: Pros vs. Cons

Potential Benefit	Potential Risk (The "Bad")
Lower EV Prices: More cars under $35k for consumers.	Auto Job Losses: Domestic manufacturers can't compete with subsidized prices.
Agricultural Relief: China dropped tariffs on Canadian canola.	U.S. Tension: Risks a trade war with Canada's largest partner (the U.S.).
Trade Diversification: Reduces total reliance on the U.S. market.	Security Risks: Data privacy and cybersecurity concerns.