for example: Oct 28th.
"Russian forces almost certainly do not currently control any positions within the city of Pokrovsk itself."
Oct 31st:
ISW assesses that this infiltration mission did not change the control of terrain or the forward edge of the battle area (FEBA).
From what ISW has specified, I can confidently draw the following conclusion:
1. ISW expcitly specifies that Russian forces almost certainly do nto control any positions within the city of pokrovsk itself, and the fluid nature of the front line makes it difficult to assess a precise degree of control or offer a percentage.
2. What does solid red really mean? it means confirmed current Russian used to appear and control at that time but not necessarily permanent or complete.
3. Infiltration mission may occur in a solid red zone, but if they fail or are tactical, ISW don't change the solid red designation (the are remains Russian-controlled because they already had control). It is like someone sneaking in another person's window. it may cause temporary disruption, but it doesn't change who owns the house overall.
4. Solid red zone like a house Russian forces are living in today but tomorrow they could be kicked out.
劝告俄死忠们别不如你家小朋友，他们可能都可以读字字了，你还只会看画画，要学会读字！
