说我们什么傲慢？还原罪？至少我们在自己国家傲慢原罪，有马族整天傲慢中共祖国的作法就是每断时间吃喝拉撒贡献干货给他们祖国，然后还是呼噜噜移民到日本和我们这。sorry, 见一次替马族中共祖国，大陆人民教川这堆见利忘义被背信弃义的跪族。
Good question — but no, Japan is fully capable of building aircraft carriers.
Japan doesn’t have traditional aircraft carriers mainly because of legal and political reasons, not technical limits. Here’s why:
- Constitutional restrictions:
After World War II, Japan adopted a pacifist constitution (Article 9), which renounces war and forbids maintaining “war potential.” For decades, this has been interpreted as banning offensive weapons — like full-scale aircraft carriers that can project power abroad. - Political framing:
Japan calls its navy “Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force” (JMSDF), emphasizing defense. So instead of “aircraft carriers,” it has “helicopter destroyers” (DDH) — large ships that can carry helicopters and, recently, short takeoff and vertical landing (STOVL) jets like the F-35B. - Reality today:
Japan actually is converting its Izumo-class helicopter destroyers into light aircraft carriers capable of operating F-35B fighters.- JS Izumo (DDH-183) and JS Kaga (DDH-184) are being modified with heat-resistant decks and other changes.
- Once finished, they will essentially be small aircraft carriers, similar in function to those used by the UK or Italy.
- Industrial capability:
Japan’s shipbuilding industry is extremely advanced — it can absolutely design and build a full-size carrier if it wanted to. The limitation is purely strategic and constitutional, not technical.
Would you like me to show what Japan’s Izumo-class carrier can currently do and how it compares to, say, a U.S. carrier?
