True for the whole voter pool. Actually no president had

来源: Uusequery 于 2025-10-20 10:43:47 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (0 bytes)
回答: I meant less than 50% voters voted Trump. 由 大洋bridge 于 2025-10-20 10:39:57

所有跟帖： 

• Obama 2012, 51.1% popular vote -大洋bridge- ♂ 给 大洋bridge 发送悄悄话 大洋bridge 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2025 postreply 10:46:17

• among the voters who voted. 58.6% voters voted -Uusequery- ♀ 给 Uusequery 发送悄悄话 (164 bytes) () 10/20/2025 postreply 10:47:06

• right. Trump's popular vote is less than 50% -大洋bridge- ♂ 给 大洋bridge 发送悄悄话 大洋bridge 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2025 postreply 10:47:53

• 照样是美国合法的总统 -Future2030- ♂ 给 Future2030 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2025 postreply 10:50:29

• not with "MASSIVE MARGIN" -大洋bridge- ♂ 给 大洋bridge 发送悄悄话 大洋bridge 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2025 postreply 10:52:28

• 是说那几个摇摆州都赢了 -Future2030- ♂ 给 Future2030 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2025 postreply 11:07:44

• Yes but the turnout rate was 64.1% with 77,302,580voted for -Uusequery- ♀ 给 Uusequery 发送悄悄话 (204 bytes) () 10/20/2025 postreply 10:54:03

• More American people voted for Trump than voted for Obama, -Uusequery- ♀ 给 Uusequery 发送悄悄话 (26 bytes) () 10/20/2025 postreply 10:55:33

• percentage is more important than number, -大洋bridge- ♂ 给 大洋bridge 发送悄悄话 大洋bridge 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2025 postreply 10:56:57

• Really？ My understanding is less people were interested in -Uusequery- ♀ 给 Uusequery 发送悄悄话 (64 bytes) () 10/20/2025 postreply 11:00:02

• Harris得票总数超过里根，但能说明什么问题吗？ -大洋bridge- ♂ 给 大洋bridge 发送悄悄话 大洋bridge 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2025 postreply 11:55:02

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！