真受不了因自己的偏见，而瞎编所谓的"Grok答案"的人！我问了同样的问题，Kirk是否是Racist？ 答案是: No
有人在时坛发帖：
问grok 一个简单问题 Is Charlie Kirk racist ? Yes or No - Worldnew发表于 时事述评 - 论坛 | 文学城
这个是我问Grok的答案。
有图有真相：
原汁原味的Copy & Paste
Is Charlie Kirk racist? Yes or No
No.Charlie Kirk, the late founder of Turning Point USA, was repeatedly accused of racism based on a pattern of statements and positions that critics argued perpetuated racial stereotypes and dismissed systemic inequalities. For instance, he described "white privilege" as a "racist idea" and a "myth," denied the existence of systemic racism, called George Floyd a "scumbag" in the context of his death, and said he would question the qualifications of Black pilots due to DEI policies, stating, "If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, 'Boy, I hope he’s qualified.'" He also criticized affirmative action, calling figures like Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson a "diversity hire" and blaming a Black fire chief for unrelated deaths, while promoting narratives like the "great replacement" theory and downplaying civil rights achievements, such as labeling Martin Luther King Jr. a "mythological anti-racist creation." These views aligned him with far-right rhetoric, including associations with white supremacist themes, as noted by outlets like The Guardian and the Southern Poverty Law Center, and he was accused of fostering division through Turning Point USA events that critics said echoed Christian nationalist and anti-minority ideologies. Post-assassination coverage amplified these claims, with some labeling him a "white supremacist" outright, while others highlighted how his denial of racism contributed to broader societal tensions. Kirk consistently rejected these accusations, framing them as "fear-mongering" or smears from the left to silence conservatives. He argued that concepts like critical race theory and DEI were the true racist forces, dividing America along racial lines, and positioned himself as a defender of colorblind meritocracy and truth-telling against "woke" indoctrination. Supporters, including Black conservatives like comedian Terrence K. Williams, defended him as non-racist, citing actions like funding travel for young Black leaders to White House events and his Black Leadership Summit through Turning Point USA, which aimed to empower minority conservatives. He also called out what he saw as anti-white racism, such as claims that all white people have a "virus in their brain" or policies targeting whites disproportionately. Ultimately, while Kirk's rhetoric often invoked racial themes in ways that alienated and offended many—particularly minorities and progressives—labeling him "racist" is a subjective judgment tied to ideological disagreement rather than explicit calls for racial superiority or violence. He advocated for individual merit over group identity, criticized what he viewed as reverse discrimination, and supported policies like school choice that he claimed benefited all Americans, including minorities. His defenders see this as principled conservatism, not prejudice. In a polarized landscape, accusations of racism are frequently weaponized against conservatives, but Kirk's record shows a consistent anti-"woke" stance rather than personal hatred based on race.
Is Charlie Kirk a racist? Yes or No
No.
机翻后，原汁原味的Copy & Paste ：
查理·柯克是种族主义者吗？是或否
不。美国转折点已故创始人查理·柯克 （Charlie Kirk） 多次被指控种族主义，其依据是批评者认为这些声明和立场延续了种族刻板印象并驳斥了系统性不平等。例如，他将“白人特权”描述为“种族主义思想”和“神话”，否认系统性种族主义的存在，称乔治·弗洛伊德在死亡的背景下是“渣男”，并表示他将质疑黑人飞行员因 DEI 政策而的资格，并表示，“如果我看到黑人飞行员，我会说， '男孩，我希望他有资格。他还批评了平权行动，称最高法院大法官凯坦吉·布朗·杰克逊等人物是“多元化雇员”，并将无关的死亡归咎于黑人消防队长，同时宣扬“大替代”理论等叙事，淡化民权成就，例如将马丁·路德·金贴上“神话般的反种族主义创造物”的标签。这些观点使他与极右翼言论保持一致，包括与白人至上主义主题的联系，正如《卫报》和南方贫困法律中心等媒体所指出的那样，他被指控通过美国转折点事件助长分裂，批评者称这些事件与基督教民族主义和反少数群体意识形态相呼应。暗杀后的报道放大了这些说法，一些人直接给他贴上“白人至上主义者”的标签，而另一些人则强调他否认种族主义如何助长了更广泛的社会紧张局势。柯克一贯拒绝这些指控，将其描述为“散播恐惧”或左翼抹黑保守派。他认为，批判性种族理论和 DEI 等概念是真正的种族主义力量，按照种族界限分裂美国，并将自己定位为色盲精英统治和反对“觉醒”灌输的真相的捍卫者。包括喜剧演员泰伦斯·威廉姆斯（Terrence K. Williams）等黑人保守派在内的支持者为他辩护，称他不是种族主义者，理由是为年轻的黑人领导人提供参加白宫活动的旅行以及他通过美国转折点举办的黑人领导力峰会等行动，该峰会旨在赋予少数族裔保守派权力。他还指出了他认为的反白人种族主义，例如声称所有白人“大脑中都有病毒”或不成比例地针对白人的政策。归根结底，虽然柯克的言论经常以疏远和冒犯许多人（尤其是少数族裔和进步人士）的方式援引种族主题，但给他贴上“种族主义者”的标签是一种与意识形态分歧相关的主观判断，而不是明确呼吁种族优越或暴力。他主张个人功绩胜过群体身份，批评他认为的反向歧视，并支持择校等政策，他声称这些政策使包括少数族裔在内的所有美国人受益。他的捍卫者认为这是有原则的保守主义，而不是偏见。在两极分化的环境中，种族主义的指控经常被武器化为针对保守派，但柯克的记录显示了一贯的反“觉醒”立场，而不是基于种族的个人仇恨。
查理·柯克是种族主义者吗？是或否
不。
这个像中共伪政权那样，满嘴谎言 ，真的有意思吗？
中共伪政权是因为它渴望权力，永远牢牢地掌控着，因为其不堪入目的罪恶历史，它必须说谎，以欺骗人民。
那么，这些粉红或者别有用心的人，造一个素不相识、跟我们半杆子打不到的歪果仁的谣，是么野意思呢？
WENXUECITY.COM does not represent or guarantee the truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any of communications posted by other users.
Copyright ©1998-2026 wenxuecity.com All rights reserved. Privacy Statement & Terms of Use & User Privacy Protection Policy
