还有一个国家在这方面领先,大家可能想不到。

回答: US-China in a defining race for quantum supremacyUusequery2025-07-17 09:11:07
 

As of mid-2025, no single country has absolute dominance in quantum computing, but three countries lead the global race — each with strengths in different areas:


United States — Overall Leader in Commercial Innovation

  • Strengths: Home to tech giants like IBM, Google, Microsoft, and startups like Rigetti, IonQ, PsiQuantum.

  • Milestones:

    • Google claimed “quantum supremacy” in 2019 (controversial but groundbreaking).

    • IBM released a 1,121-qubit chip ("Condor") and is building a 100,000-qubit roadmap.

  • Edge: Private sector strength, venture capital, and academic institutions (e.g., MIT, Caltech).


China — Leader in Quantum Communications & Government Investment

  • Strengths: Heavy state funding, a national quantum strategy, and rapid progress in quantum networks.

  • Milestones:

    • Jiuzhang photonic quantum computer (outperformed classical ones on specific tasks).

    • Operates quantum satellite (Micius) and a quantum communication network across cities.

  • Edge: Quantum cryptography, sensing, and communication.


Canada — Leader in Superconducting & Quantum Software

  • Strengths: D-Wave Systems (pioneer of quantum annealing), deep academic roots (Waterloo, Perimeter Institute).

  • Edge: Early mover in hardware and growing ecosystem for quantum software.


Europe (especially Germany, France, Netherlands)

  • Strengths: Coordinated EU-level funding and focus on quantum internet, neutral atom systems, and hardware diversity.

  • Edge: Collaboration and niche advances.


TL;DR:

Country Edge Weakness
US Best hardware/software ecosystem, private innovation Lacks national coordination vs China
China Government-backed, strong in comms/security Less open, less commercial innovation
Canada Early hardware leader, quantum software Smaller scale
Europe Collaboration, niche expertise Fragmented efforts

So while the U.S. currently leads overall, China is catching up fast, especially in strategic applications like encryption and national security. The "uphand" depends on what aspect you're measuring — hardware power, communication, application, or strategy.

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!