- The Supreme Court explicitly left open the possibility that states might be granted nationwide relief in their lawsuits against the federal government, but it declined to definitively resolve the issue, deferring it to lower courts to consider.
- Justice Amy Coney Barrett, in the majority opinion, indicated that a nationwide injunction might be necessary to provide "complete relief" to states in certain cases.
- Lower courts will now have to determine whether a nationwide injunction is appropriate when a state brings a lawsuit against the federal government, and they will need to consider the arguments made by states about why such broad relief is needed.
如果州和联邦政府打官司,州还是可以要求nation wise injunction.
Based on the recent Supreme Court ruling regarding nationwide injunctions, states
may still be able to seek relief that could be akin to a nationwide injunction when suing the federal government, but the scope of such relief is currently uncertain. Here's why:
In summary:
The Supreme Court ruling limited the ability of individual judges to issue nationwide injunctions that block executive actions throughout the country. However, the court did not rule out the possibility that states could still obtain nationwide relief in their lawsuits against the federal government. The extent of that possibility and the circumstances under which such relief would be granted are now left to the lower courts to determine.
AI responses may include mistakes. For legal advice, consult a professional. Learn more
所有跟帖:
•
SCOTUS 限制全国范围裁决的判决是针对个人或团体发起的官司。
-voiceofme-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
06/29/2025 postreply
14:31:53