不遵守法律（不清理暴力犯罪分子）， 就会失去享受待遇

Scott Bessent has announced that not only do they want to strip away Harvard’s tax-exempt status, but they may now tax Harvard’s endowments.

Let’s make it happen.

pic.twitter.com/xdQE8aQYev

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) May 24, 2025

所有跟帖： 

• Jan 6暴力冲击国会大厦的犯罪分子被清理了吗？煽动者呢？ -爬山看秋叶- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:20:16

• 2024年总统大选的结果已经回答了这个问题。提醒一下，单靠MAGAers川普当不了总统。总票数也超过了一半。 -Uusequery- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:23:22

• 大选和Jan 6暴力犯罪有什么关系？ -监考老师- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:26:00

• 自己理解。 -Uusequery- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:28:54

• No! Although the Jan 6 rioters were pardoned by executive -青雨紫烟- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:28:54

• authority, this does not equate to innocence; rather, it -青雨紫烟- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:30:52

• it confirms their legal status as individuals guilty of -青雨紫烟- ♀ (131 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:32:09

• so you are saying all pardoned by biden are real criminals -internuts- ♂ (43 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:35:44

• Or, in general, all who were pardoned were criminals? -Uusequery- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:43:28

• Yes, legitimate criminals Or being retaliated ones -青雨紫烟- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:46:08

• 天青水蓝, could you verify if her statement is correct? :) -internuts- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:48:50

• So, following your explanation, those Jan.6 guys could be -Uusequery- ♀ (37 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:50:26

• the fact is the us law already sentenced them as criminals -青雨紫烟- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:51:52

• Unless you don’t obey and accept the us law and orders. -青雨紫烟- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:52:23

• Everyone should obey the law. The question is if the people -Uusequery- ♀ (70 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:56:56

• They have right to appeal but if law does not say you are -青雨紫烟- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:59:08

• you are innocent then pardon admits the legitimate fact. -青雨紫烟- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 15:00:12

• All I am saying is pardon !=innocent. Got it? Quite opposit -青雨紫烟- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:55:07

• Dr. Fauci and General Miley were pardoned by Biden, they are -Uusequery- ♀ (62 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 15:21:36

• Were they sentenced as criminals before by law? -青雨紫烟- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 15:26:57

• Then why pardon them, pardon for what? -Uusequery- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 15:35:21

• To be retaliated -青雨紫烟- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 15:40:11

• not joking? Where is the justice in the US? -Uusequery- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 15:44:28

• You meant trumps executive orders? -青雨紫烟- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 16:02:34

• those like chaney have not gone thru legal procedings but -internuts- ♂ (174 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:52:23

• 痴呆政府不是违法起诉了吗。 被高院判无效。 已经过了法律程序了。 -bustout- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:29:06

• 大多数美国选民同意高院判决， 重选船铺入住白宫。 -bustout- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:31:40

• 川普再次入住白宫，美国人民最为最大的陪审团已经宣布了他们的审判结果 -随意看看～- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 14:51:55

• 不记得Jan 6被告中有谁被jury定罪，好像都是自己plea guilty的。pardon只是豁免了惩罚不等于没发生过 -天青水蓝- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 15:26:59

• Fauci也是？ -Uusequery- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 15:37:59

• Fauci还没有被起诉呢。至少得先被联邦起诉后才有机会plea guilty -天青水蓝- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 15:44:36

• 如连被告自己都认为自己有罪，还有谁能辩称他们无罪？老川只是运用总统特赦权赦免了他们的惩罚，万斯甚至说过打伤警察的不应赦免 -天青水蓝- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/24/2025 postreply 15:41:00