有关联邦法官能否被弹劾,Grok是这么说的。

Yes, a federal judge can be impeached. In the United States, federal judges, including those serving on district courts, courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court, can be removed from office through the impeachment process outlined in the Constitution.

The process works as follows:

  1. Initiation in the House of Representatives: Impeachment begins in the U.S. House of Representatives. Any member of the House can propose an impeachment resolution, or an investigation can be initiated by the House Judiciary Committee. The grounds for impeachment are typically "high crimes and misdemeanors," a phrase from Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution, which applies to federal judges as well as the President and other civil officers. This can include serious misconduct, abuse of power, corruption, or other offenses deemed incompatible with judicial integrity.
  2. Investigation and Articles of Impeachment: The House Judiciary Committee investigates the allegations. If sufficient evidence is found, the committee drafts and votes on articles of impeachment—specific charges against the judge. The full House then debates and votes on these articles. A simple majority (more than half of those voting) is required to impeach.
  3. Trial in the Senate: If the House approves the articles of impeachment, the case moves to the U.S. Senate for a trial. The Senate acts as the court, with senators serving as jurors. For Supreme Court justices or other high-profile cases, the House appoints managers to act as prosecutors, while the judge (or their legal counsel) presents a defense. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presides over the trial if it involves the President, but for federal judges, the Vice President (as President of the Senate) or a designated senator typically presides.
  4. Conviction and Removal: After hearing evidence and arguments, the Senate votes on whether to convict. A two-thirds majority (at least 67 senators if all 100 are present and voting) is required to convict. If convicted, the judge is removed from office. The Senate can also vote to disqualify the judge from holding any future federal office, though this additional penalty is optional and requires a separate vote.

Historically, this process has been rare for federal judges. Since the founding of the United States, only 15 federal judges have been impeached by the House, and of those, 8 were convicted and removed by the Senate. The most recent example was Judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr., who was impeached and removed in 2010 for corruption and perjury.

So, while it’s possible and has happened, impeaching a federal judge is an uncommon and politically charged event, reflecting the high bar set for lifetime-appointed judiciary members.

所有跟帖: 

和弹劾总统的门槛一样高,除非民主党支持否则不可能达到参院的2/3 -天青水蓝- 给 天青水蓝 发送悄悄话 天青水蓝 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 17:52:30

没错。这才是三权分立的基本保证。总统又不能开除法官。看把下面急得。 -Uusequery- 给 Uusequery 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 17:56:50

也不绝对。所以要警告一下朱党别太过分,太过的话,全红的国会将会使用核选项,过半就行。这的确争议很大,但是是朱党开的头 -ecolio157h7- 给 ecolio157h7 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 18:01:59

过半通过只限和预算有关的法案 -天青水蓝- 给 天青水蓝 发送悄悄话 天青水蓝 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 18:39:14

我记得连高院法官都能被弹劾 -仁雅居- 给 仁雅居 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 17:54:44

当然能,美国从建国以来只弹劾过11个法官,全部是因为个人操守问题 -天青水蓝- 给 天青水蓝 发送悄悄话 天青水蓝 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 17:58:17

法制也不是一个政见不同的反对党法官说了算吧?一个区域性小法官就能对总统有这么大的制约力,也算奇葩了。 -QinHwang- 给 QinHwang 发送悄悄话 QinHwang 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 17:59:02

而且让转运罪犯的飞机再飞回来,简直荒唐。飞回来以后,what is the next? -Uusequery- 给 Uusequery 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 18:03:42

为什么说他们是罪犯,有过审判吗?陪审团一致认为他们全部罪名成立吗?就跟特朗普那样? -Penuium- 给 Penuium 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 18:06:27

这里面有个司法程序的问题。按照移民法要经过移民法庭审理获得法官签发的驱逐令才能驱逐,政府现在援引外国敌人法跳过了这个步骤 -天青水蓝- 给 天青水蓝 发送悄悄话 天青水蓝 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 19:59:22

但是外国敌人法是只有在美国遭到入侵时才适用的,政府认为委内瑞拉黑帮入侵了美国,这算不算入侵可否构成适用此法的条件存在争议 -天青水蓝- 给 天青水蓝 发送悄悄话 天青水蓝 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 20:01:58

当然可以弹劾,马斯克早就说了。罗伯兹的意思是听到判决后就嚷嚷弹劾法官,不太合适,不是200年以来约定俗成的。问题时之前 -ecolio157h7- 给 ecolio157h7 发送悄悄话 (132 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 17:59:38

赞同。不能用这样的方法来解决判决的分歧。 -Uusequery- 给 Uusequery 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 18:07:38

不是可不可以弹劾的问题,是为啥要弹劾的问题!哪有不按我的希望判决一个案子就要弹劾法官的道理?特朗普就是逆我者亡! -Penuium- 给 Penuium 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 17:59:52

这个左棍法官两肋插刀为黑帮非移对抗移民局,主党咋都是这种不着调的货呢 -仁雅居- 给 仁雅居 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 18:19:32

宪法规定政府要受国会和法院监督,不服判决可以向上一级法院上诉 -天青水蓝- 给 天青水蓝 发送悄悄话 天青水蓝 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/18/2025 postreply 20:29:43

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!