拜登总统任期内给予乌克兰的经济军事援助是无偿的还是要还的?看Grok怎么说。。。

Yes, the Biden administration has provided Ukraine with significant financial and military support, much of which has been given without expectation of direct repayment, effectively making it "free" in the sense of grants or aid rather than loans requiring reimbursement. This support began shortly after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and has continued through various packages authorized by Congress and Presidential authority.

 

On the military side, the U.S. has delivered billions of dollars’ worth of equipment, including weapons, ammunition, and vehicles, often drawn from existing Department of Defense stocks under the Presidential Drawdown Authority or funded through the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI). For example, in April 2022, Biden announced an $800 million military aid package including artillery and drones, followed by numerous other packages, such as a $2.5 billion military aid announcement in December 2024. By early 2025, the U.S. had committed over $62 billion in security assistance since the start of the Biden administration, with items like air defense systems, artillery, and F-16 support equipment provided to bolster Ukraine’s defense against Russia. These transfers are typically grants, not sales, meaning Ukraine does not pay for them upfront or owe repayment.

 

Financially, the U.S. has also provided direct economic assistance to Ukraine to stabilize its government and economy during the war. In April 2022, Biden authorized $500 million in economic aid for government salaries and services, and in December 2024, an additional $3.5 billion was sent for similar purposes. The total U.S. economic support has exceeded $1 billion since the invasion began, with no public terms indicating this aid must be repaid as a loan. Instead, it’s framed as support to help Ukraine sustain itself amid Russia’s aggression.

 

Congress has approved much of this aid through supplemental funding bills, such as the $175 billion allocated across five bills since 2022, of which about $106 billion directly aids Ukraine (the rest supports U.S. activities or regional allies). While some aid, like the $95 billion package signed in April 2024, has been debated fiercely, it passed with bipartisan support and no explicit repayment requirement for Ukraine. Critics on platforms like X have claimed this money is unaccounted for or wasted, but official statements from the White House and Department of Defense emphasize it’s tracked and aimed at specific needs, like weapons production or budgetary stability.

 

That said, not all support is entirely "free" in a broader sense—some military aid involves replenishing U.S. stocks, indirectly benefiting American industry, and future discussions about Ukraine’s reconstruction might involve expectations of economic alignment or mineral rights. However, as of March 1, 2025, the Biden administration’s direct financial and military assistance to Ukraine has been provided as aid, not loans or purchases, aligning with a U.S. policy of countering Russia without expecting immediate repayment from Ukraine.

所有跟帖: 

特朗普政府可以不再帮助,但不能站在侵略者一边对弱小者进行打压。。。 -Penuium- 给 Penuium 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/01/2025 postreply 10:07:17

you are on your own 不是打压。美国难道非出钱不可?谁规定的?美国难道非要牺牲年轻人?谁规定的? -哪一枝杏花- 给 哪一枝杏花 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/01/2025 postreply 10:10:50

强迫签协议还不是? -cn_abcd- 给 cn_abcd 发送悄悄话 cn_abcd 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/01/2025 postreply 10:14:34

川普和美国政府官员言论不算数? -cn_abcd- 给 cn_abcd 发送悄悄话 cn_abcd 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/01/2025 postreply 10:17:42

zactly. where is 强迫? -internuts- 给 internuts 发送悄悄话 internuts 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/01/2025 postreply 10:23:24

有些人为了土共搅浑水,最好全世界都下场打成一锅粥,墙国独善其身。 -Sandcity2000- 给 Sandcity2000 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/01/2025 postreply 10:15:58

墙国卖武器,卖零件,卖军备,顺手拿下台湾 -哪一枝杏花- 给 哪一枝杏花 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/01/2025 postreply 10:21:12

援助不要给,以后老川在一旁当一个观众就行了 -L- 给 L 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/01/2025 postreply 10:12:21

给欧洲一个机会,让他们解决,如果乌克兰还没有亡国的话,美国最后收拾残局好了 -哪一枝杏花- 给 哪一枝杏花 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/01/2025 postreply 10:17:28

我觉得是无偿。理由是 -Fireeye她姥爷- 给 Fireeye她姥爷 发送悄悄话 Fireeye她姥爷 的博客首页 (182 bytes) () 03/01/2025 postreply 10:15:25

所以是有有偿和有无偿。但是拜登2022年签署的租借法案是延续1941年的。并不是象川政府说的完全无偿,对吧? -青雨紫烟- 给 青雨紫烟 发送悄悄话 青雨紫烟 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/01/2025 postreply 11:07:01

我并不是说2022年的租借法案cover 所有。只是这个2022eo 是租借法案。 -青雨紫烟- 给 青雨紫烟 发送悄悄话 青雨紫烟 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/01/2025 postreply 11:10:52

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!